From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:53770 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752359AbYICXYv (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2008 19:24:51 -0400 Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:24:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20080903.162444.150409734.davem@davemloft.net> (sfid-20080904_012456_874659_CB3487B1) To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, tomasw@gmail.com, yi.zhu@intel.com, linville@tuxdriver.com Subject: Re: [GIT]: Networking From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <20080903.161341.239039051.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Linus Torvalds Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 16:20:43 -0700 (PDT) > > > On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote: > > > > 4) Several iwlwifi fixes: > > Are these really regressions? > > And if they aren't, why are they here and now? > > Are people really so _stupid_ that they think that no fixes ever cause new > regressions, so that they think that because they are "fixes" they are > safe? > > Please, guys. I complained once about this already. What's so hard to > understand? I pushed back on these guys a lot, so did John Linville. But you're right, I'll just stop taking things from the Intel wireless people. I'm fucking tired of their shit too. Maybe now they'll learn.