From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de,
John W Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] b43legacy: Fix failure in rate-adjustment mechanism
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 21:04:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200809062104.15274.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1220727470.10102.9.camel@johannes.berg>
On Saturday 06 September 2008 20:57:50 Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 20:55 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > On Saturday 06 September 2008 20:52:53 Larry Finger wrote:
> > > Michael Buesch wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 06 September 2008 20:34:02 Larry Finger wrote:
> > > >> A coding error present since b43legacy was incorporated into the
> > > >> kernel has prevented the driver from using the rate-setting mechanism
> > > >> of mac80211. The driver has been forced to remain at a 1 Mb/s rate.
> > > >
> > > > Does version3 firmware have a different bitlayout for the status?
> > >
> > > It seems so. I found this because I was not getting any acks back to
> > > net/mac80211/rc80211_pid_algo.c. I then reviewed the V3 specs, found
> > > that bit 0, not bit 1, contained the ack. Test prints confirmed that
> > > result. With this patch, both my BCM4306/2 and BCM4303 reach the
> > > maximum rate. With the current code, 54 Mb/s is not as fast as 36
> > > Mb/s, but at least the algorithm is working.
> >
> > Yeah ok. I just asked, because it seems the _whole_ flags bitfield
> > is rightshifted by one (so the other flags are wrong, too. See the
> > intermediate flag)
>
> It is, this isn't really a difference between the two but a result of
> you shifting it up/down due to the tx status via dma queue vs. tx status
> via registers thing.
Yeah, that's the point. larry's patch modified both the register and dmaqueue
mechanism. I think the register mechanism might be correct as-is (Or is it even
dead code and it's not used by any legacy device?)
--
Greetings Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-06 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-06 18:34 [PATCH] b43legacy: Fix failure in rate-adjustment mechanism Larry Finger
2008-09-06 18:41 ` Michael Buesch
2008-09-06 18:44 ` John W. Linville
2008-09-06 18:52 ` Larry Finger
2008-09-06 18:55 ` Michael Buesch
2008-09-06 18:57 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-06 19:04 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2008-09-06 19:36 ` Larry Finger
2008-09-06 19:41 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-06 19:59 ` Larry Finger
2008-09-06 20:02 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-06 20:07 ` Michael Buesch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200809062104.15274.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=tim.gardner@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).