From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: John W Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] b43: A patch for control of the radio LED using rfkill
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:19:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200809181519.12366.IvDoorn@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48d1e227.AmBwRnEuhx6kxlHv%Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Hi,
> @@ -60,18 +58,40 @@ static void b43_rfkill_poll(struct input
> enabled = b43_is_hw_radio_enabled(dev);
> if (unlikely(enabled != dev->radio_hw_enable)) {
> dev->radio_hw_enable = enabled;
> - report_change = 1;
> b43info(wl, "Radio hardware status changed to %s\n",
> enabled ? "ENABLED" : "DISABLED");
> + if (!enabled)
> + rfkill_force_state(rfk->rfkill,
> + RFKILL_STATE_HARD_BLOCKED);
> + else {
> + if (!dev->phy.radio_on)
> + rfkill_force_state(rfk->rfkill,
> + RFKILL_STATE_SOFT_BLOCKED);
> + else
> + rfkill_force_state(rfk->rfkill,
> + RFKILL_STATE_UNBLOCKED);
> + }
Is dev->phy.radio_on set when mac80211 has send an instruction
to the driver to enable the radio (start() or config() callback)
or does it represent the key state in the hardware?
If it is something coming from mac80211, then you do not want
to send a SOFT_BLOCKED event since that will cause all other radios
to be switched off simply because the b43 interface has not been
enabled.
Off course when it represents the key state in the hardware then the
code would be fine...
Ivo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-18 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-18 5:07 [RFC] b43: A patch for control of the radio LED using rfkill Larry Finger
2008-09-18 13:19 ` Ivo van Doorn [this message]
2008-09-18 13:47 ` Larry Finger
2008-09-18 13:53 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 14:21 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 14:26 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 14:52 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 15:19 ` [PATCH] rfkill: clarify usage of rfkill_force_state() and rfkill->get_state() Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 15:24 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 16:43 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 16:45 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-18 17:32 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 17:52 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-18 18:12 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 17:40 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 17:41 ` [RFC] b43: A patch for control of the radio LED using rfkill Michael Buesch
2008-09-18 17:37 ` Michael Buesch
2008-09-18 17:48 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 17:56 ` Michael Buesch
2008-09-18 18:10 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 18:17 ` Michael Buesch
2008-09-18 18:23 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 18:34 ` Michael Buesch
2008-09-18 18:36 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-18 19:23 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 20:09 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 19:08 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 20:17 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 20:28 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 20:42 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 17:34 ` Michael Buesch
2008-09-18 17:42 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 17:49 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-18 18:02 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 19:50 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 17:53 ` Michael Buesch
2008-09-18 18:06 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 14:10 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 14:24 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 14:37 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 15:16 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 16:08 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 16:51 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 18:47 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 19:14 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-18 20:35 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 21:34 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 17:44 ` Michael Buesch
2008-09-18 17:52 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 17:54 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-18 18:06 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 18:13 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-18 20:10 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 20:41 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 21:36 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-19 17:02 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-20 13:10 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-20 13:20 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-22 3:01 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-22 21:16 ` Michael Buesch
2008-09-18 17:31 ` Michael Buesch
2008-09-18 20:13 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200809181519.12366.IvDoorn@gmail.com \
--to=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).