From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
To: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
John W Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] b43: A patch for control of the radio LED using rfkill
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 10:10:10 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080920131010.GB16430@khazad-dum.debian.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200809191902.03467.IvDoorn@gmail.com>
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> > Even if that means a need to
> > get EV_SW SW_WLAN out of Dmitry... I don't know if rt2x000 wants SW_WLAN or
> > SW_RFKILL_ALL.
>
> Not sure either, there is no way to determine which of the 2 should be used.
Should be an module parameter or runtime (sysfs?) parameter, then...
> Oh an to make sure I get it completely right this time:
> When I implement the input polldev, I no longer have to use rfkill_force_state() right?
Correct. It has nothing to do with the rfkill class part of your driver at
all, since there is no effect on the hardware. It is just an input device
that issues EV_SW events.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-20 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-18 5:07 [RFC] b43: A patch for control of the radio LED using rfkill Larry Finger
2008-09-18 13:19 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 13:47 ` Larry Finger
2008-09-18 13:53 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 14:21 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 14:26 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 14:52 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 15:19 ` [PATCH] rfkill: clarify usage of rfkill_force_state() and rfkill->get_state() Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 15:24 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 16:43 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 16:45 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-18 17:32 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 17:52 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-18 18:12 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 17:40 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 17:41 ` [RFC] b43: A patch for control of the radio LED using rfkill Michael Buesch
2008-09-18 17:37 ` Michael Buesch
2008-09-18 17:48 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 17:56 ` Michael Buesch
2008-09-18 18:10 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 18:17 ` Michael Buesch
2008-09-18 18:23 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 18:34 ` Michael Buesch
2008-09-18 18:36 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-18 19:23 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 20:09 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 19:08 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 20:17 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 20:28 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 20:42 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 17:34 ` Michael Buesch
2008-09-18 17:42 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 17:49 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-18 18:02 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 19:50 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 17:53 ` Michael Buesch
2008-09-18 18:06 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 14:10 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 14:24 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 14:37 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 15:16 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 16:08 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 16:51 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 18:47 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 19:14 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-18 20:35 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 21:34 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 17:44 ` Michael Buesch
2008-09-18 17:52 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 17:54 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-18 18:06 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 18:13 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-18 20:10 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-18 20:41 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-18 21:36 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-19 17:02 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-20 13:10 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [this message]
2008-09-20 13:20 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-09-22 3:01 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-22 21:16 ` Michael Buesch
2008-09-18 17:31 ` Michael Buesch
2008-09-18 20:13 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080920131010.GB16430@khazad-dum.debian.net \
--to=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
--cc=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).