From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from bu3sch.de ([62.75.166.246]:53606 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753010AbYIVVRm (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:17:42 -0400 From: Michael Buesch To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh Subject: Re: [RFC] b43: A patch for control of the radio LED using rfkill Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:16:47 +0200 Cc: Ivo van Doorn , Johannes Berg , Larry Finger , John W Linville , bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <48d1e227.AmBwRnEuhx6kxlHv%Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> <200809201520.28717.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <20080922030137.GA1817@khazad-dum.debian.net> In-Reply-To: <20080922030137.GA1817@khazad-dum.debian.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200809222316.47466.mb@bu3sch.de> (sfid-20080922_231746_686905_58323898) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Monday 22 September 2008 05:01:37 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > As long as the drivers based on mac80211 still know it is rfkill they're > dealing with (i.e. as long as they will know they MUST NOT emit energy from > the transmitter when they're soft-blocked), That's the only policy that makes sense. So I don't think it would be a problem. IMO that's how the mac80211 config API is defined, currently. -- Greetings Michael.