linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>,
	Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] iwlwifi: take a valid antenna upon rate scale init
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:25:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081006212511.GL3448@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1223280333-4383-6-git-send-email-yi.zhu@intel.com>

On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 04:05:31PM +0800, Zhu Yi wrote:
> From: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
> 
> This patch selects a valid antenna upon RS init. This solves a SYSASSERT
> complaining that the driver is setting a non valid antenna in the LQ CMD.

I suppose this is an accurate description, but I think you can do
better. :-)

> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-5000.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-5000.c
> index c1300fb..56a3f0c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-5000.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-5000.c
> @@ -811,10 +811,14 @@ static int iwl5000_hw_set_hw_params(struct iwl_priv *priv)
>  
>  	switch (priv->hw_rev & CSR_HW_REV_TYPE_MSK) {
>  	case CSR_HW_REV_TYPE_5100:
> +		priv->hw_params.tx_chains_num = 1;
> +		priv->hw_params.rx_chains_num = 2;
> +		priv->hw_params.valid_tx_ant = ANT_B;
> +		priv->hw_params.valid_rx_ant = ANT_AB;
> +		break;
>  	case CSR_HW_REV_TYPE_5150:
>  		priv->hw_params.tx_chains_num = 1;
>  		priv->hw_params.rx_chains_num = 2;
> -		/* FIXME: move to ANT_A, ANT_B, ANT_C enum */
>  		priv->hw_params.valid_tx_ant = ANT_A;
>  		priv->hw_params.valid_rx_ant = ANT_AB;
>  		break;

Do you realize that both clauses are the same (i.e. there is no
functional change)?  How is this useful?

> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.h b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.h
> index d148d73..bac91f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.h
> @@ -284,6 +284,16 @@ static inline u8 num_of_ant(u8 mask)
>  		!!((mask) & ANT_C);
>  }
>  
> +static inline u8 first_antenna(u8 mask)
> +{
> +	if (mask & ANT_A)
> +		return ANT_A;
> +	if (mask & ANT_B)
> +		return ANT_B;
> +	return ANT_C;
> +}
> +
> +
>  static inline u8 iwl4965_get_prev_ieee_rate(u8 rate_index)
>  {
>  	u8 rate = iwl_rates[rate_index].prev_ieee;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c
> index 61797f3..f9efc0c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c
> @@ -852,7 +852,7 @@ static void iwl_sta_init_lq(struct iwl_priv *priv, const u8 *addr, int is_ap)
>  	struct iwl_link_quality_cmd link_cmd = {
>  		.reserved1 = 0,
>  	};
> -	u16 rate_flags;
> +	u32 rate_flags;
>  
>  	/* Set up the rate scaling to start at selected rate, fall back
>  	 * all the way down to 1M in IEEE order, and then spin on 1M */
> @@ -869,14 +869,16 @@ static void iwl_sta_init_lq(struct iwl_priv *priv, const u8 *addr, int is_ap)
>  			rate_flags |= RATE_MCS_CCK_MSK;
>  
>  		/* Use Tx antenna B only */
> -		rate_flags |= RATE_MCS_ANT_B_MSK; /*FIXME:RS*/
> +		rate_flags |= first_antenna(priv->hw_params.valid_tx_ant) <<
> +				RATE_MCS_ANT_POS;

You need to change the comment...

John
-- 
John W. Linville		Linux should be at the core
linville@tuxdriver.com			of your literate lifestyle.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-10-06 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-06  8:05 [PATCH 0/7] iwlwifi driver 10/06 updates Zhu Yi
2008-10-06  8:05 ` [PATCH 1/7] iwlwifi: make initial calibration set configurable Zhu Yi
2008-10-06  8:05   ` [PATCH 2/7] iwlwifi: fix ct kill configuration for 5350 Zhu Yi
2008-10-06  8:05     ` [PATCH 3/7] iwlwifi: scan correct setting of valid rx_chains Zhu Yi
2008-10-06  8:05       ` [PATCH 4/7] iwlwifi: scan fix comment Zhu Yi
2008-10-06  8:05         ` [PATCH 5/7] iwlwifi: take a valid antenna upon rate scale init Zhu Yi
2008-10-06  8:05           ` [PATCH 6/7] iwlwifi: remove STATUS_CONF_PENDING in scanning Zhu Yi
2008-10-06  8:05             ` [PATCH 7/7] iwlwifi: refactor rxon time command Zhu Yi
2008-10-06 21:30               ` John W. Linville
2008-10-06 21:25           ` John W. Linville [this message]
2008-10-06 21:39             ` [PATCH 5/7] iwlwifi: take a valid antenna upon rate scale init Tomas Winkler
2008-10-06 21:42               ` John W. Linville
2008-10-06 21:16         ` [PATCH 4/7] iwlwifi: scan fix comment John W. Linville
2008-10-06 21:16       ` [PATCH 3/7] iwlwifi: scan correct setting of valid rx_chains John W. Linville
2008-10-06 21:15     ` [PATCH 2/7] iwlwifi: fix ct kill configuration for 5350 John W. Linville
2008-10-06 21:12   ` [PATCH 1/7] iwlwifi: make initial calibration set configurable John W. Linville

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081006212511.GL3448@tuxdriver.com \
    --to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
    --cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).