From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>, wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT] p54: Fix for big-endian architecture
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:29:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200810100329.48890.chunkeey@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48EEA432.7000605@lwfinger.net>
On Friday 10 October 2008 02:39:14 Larry Finger wrote:
> Christian Lamparter wrote:
>
> As the original code got the data from bootrec, I kept it the same. On
> reflection, the statement above could be
>
> priv->rx_mtu = le16_to_cpu(desc->rx_mtu);
>
> I think which structure it is in is purely a matter of taste, but I will make
> that change, test it, and submit a new patch. The big-endian fix above will also
> need to be changed. I considered converting to a single struct using unions, but
> that would get pretty messy.
>
> Larry
I finally found the definitions by Intersil (again):
> http://gxaafoot.homelinux.org/cgi-bin/archzoom.cgi/jean-baptiste.note@m4x.org--libre/prism54-usb--devo--0.0--patch-182/islsm_bra.h?diff=2
> tinyurl link: http://tinyurl.com/3wo45y
Unfortunately, back in 2002 noone though about big/little endian and 64bit :-D
/*
* Each boot record is identified by a unique code, followed
* by the length (in 32 bit words) of the data in the record.
*/
struct s_bootrec_hdr {
unsigned long code;
unsigned long length;
};
/* Generic bootrecord structure that can be mapped to each bootrecord */
struct s_bootrecord {
struct s_bootrec_hdr hdr;
char start_of_data;
};
[...]
so, what about changing bootrec to:
struct bootrec {
__le32 code;
__le32 len;
char data[0];
} __attribute__((packed));
And put this endless discussion to rest
Regards,
Chr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-10 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-09 15:19 [RFC/RFT] p54: Fix for big-endian architecture Larry Finger
2008-10-09 16:58 ` Christian Lamparter
2008-10-10 0:39 ` Larry Finger
2008-10-10 1:29 ` Christian Lamparter [this message]
2008-10-13 21:44 ` Pavel Roskin
2008-10-13 22:24 ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-13 22:36 ` Pavel Roskin
2008-10-13 22:55 ` Christian Lamparter
2008-10-13 22:55 ` Pavel Roskin
2008-10-13 23:05 ` Pavel Roskin
2008-10-13 23:07 ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-13 23:36 ` Pavel Roskin
2008-10-14 0:00 ` Pavel Roskin
2008-10-14 0:15 ` Christian Lamparter
2008-10-14 1:20 ` Pavel Roskin
2008-10-14 2:10 ` Christian Lamparter
2008-10-14 2:42 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH] p54: enable 2.4/5GHz spectrum by eeprom bits Christian Lamparter
2008-10-14 8:15 ` [RFC/RFT] p54: Fix for big-endian architecture Johannes Berg
2008-10-13 23:31 ` Christian Lamparter
2008-10-13 23:36 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200810100329.48890.chunkeey@web.de \
--to=chunkeey@web.de \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=proski@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).