linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Elias Oltmanns <eo@nebensachen.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ath5k: kernel timing screwed - due to unserialised register access?
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:32:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081010213207.GA7852@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y70wli6n.fsf@denkblock.local>

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 02:59:28PM +0200, Elias Oltmanns wrote:
> That was my first thought when I discovered this. However, from what I
> read on the web, I somehow got the impression that [um]delay() was
> alright as opposed to msleep(). What exactly is the difference then?

Yes, only msleep() sleeps, mdelay spins.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-10 21:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-05 21:45 ath5k: kernel timing screwed - due to unserialised register access? Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-05 21:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-06 14:04   ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-06 19:47     ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-07 15:27       ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-07 18:02         ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-07 18:44           ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-07 21:23             ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-08 11:39               ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-08 21:14                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-09 11:15                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-10  8:33                     ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-10 10:13                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-10 11:50                         ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-10 12:34                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-10 12:59                             ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-10 21:32                               ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2008-10-11  9:55                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-10 19:24                             ` Nick Kossifidis
2008-10-11  9:54                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-11 20:30                               ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-14 19:00                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-14 22:01                                   ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-15  8:43                                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-15 16:32                                       ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-15 19:53                                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-17 21:03                                           ` Elias Oltmanns

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081010213207.GA7852@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=eo@nebensachen.de \
    --cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).