From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:36211 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751246AbYJ1Aka (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:40:30 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:27:18 -0700 From: Greg KH To: "John W. Linville" Cc: gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] at76_usb: update drivers/staging/at76_usb w/ mac80211 port Message-ID: <20081028002718.GA2992@kroah.com> (sfid-20081028_014036_032435_568F68D6) References: <1224877739-1586-1-git-send-email-linville@tuxdriver.com> <20081027185634.GA21649@kroah.com> <20081027211553.GH20389@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <20081027211553.GH20389@tuxdriver.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 05:15:53PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:56:34AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 03:48:59PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > > This updates drivers/staging/at76_usb to correspond with the late= st > > > version previously available in wireless-testing. > > >=20 > > > Signed-off-by: John W. Linville > >=20 > > I've applied this, but it does add the following warnings, which I = don't > > think you want to have: > > drivers/staging/at76_usb/at76_usb.c:885: warning: =E2=80=98at76_se= t_associd=E2=80=99 defined but not used > > drivers/staging/at76_usb/at76_usb.c:903: warning: =E2=80=98at76_se= t_listen_interval=E2=80=99 defined but not used > > drivers/staging/at76_usb/at76_usb.c:989: warning: =E2=80=98at76_ad= d_mac_address=E2=80=99 defined but not used > >=20 > >=20 > > I'll remove these unused functions now from the in-kernel version. >=20 > Those were still there because Kalle had said he intended to use them= =2E > I see no need to carry them since you have them in git anyway. Heh, fine, they are now gone, we can't add patches that add warnings :) > > Is there any way to do development on this in the staging version n= ow, > > instead of the wireless-testing tree? >=20 > Fine with me, although I do have at least one patch for it that > relates to a pending API change -- I just figured I'd wait for the > round-trip of the patch above and then carry just that patch in my > tree along with the mac80211 API changes that prompted it. Any other > development makes sense to go to your tree. How about just sending that patch in when the api change goes in. I have no problem with other people sending in patches through their tree= s that touch the staging directory for stuff like this, as it makes your life much easier. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireles= s" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html