From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: No ProbeResp - assume out of range
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 13:19:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081104181958.GA22897@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43e72e890811021305k19e9a314i6400cd1a759b3d00@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 01:05:56PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> I'm curious if others are getting this frequently as I am:
>
> No ProbeResp from current AP 00:DE:AD:BE:EE:FF - assume out of range
>
> I get this with ath5k and ath9k, can be triggered easily in ath5k by
> doing a lot of consecutive:
>
> iwlist wlan0 scan
>
> I have to check if I can trigger this with ath9k by scanning too. We
> were seeing this with ath9k but were thinking it was ath9k related as
> it can be triggered on it after doing a large TX. Wondering if this is
> more of a generic and mac80211 issue.
I'm seeing this all the time with ath9k. For now I'm running with the
following local hack:
Index: linux-2.6/net/mac80211/mlme.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/net/mac80211/mlme.c 2008-11-04 18:10:41.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6/net/mac80211/mlme.c 2008-11-04 18:10:56.000000000 +0100
@@ -972,7 +972,7 @@ static void ieee80211_associated(struct
"current AP %s - assume out of "
"range\n",
sdata->dev->name, print_mac(mac, ifsta->bssid));
- disassoc = 1;
+// disassoc = 1;
} else
ieee80211_send_probe_req(sdata, ifsta->bssid,
ifsta->ssid,
which makes the problem of an actual disassociation after this message
go away which made wireless completely unuseable with -rc3 for. Given
that the message never appears a second time just increasing the time
it appears that just increasing IEEE80211_MONITORING_INTERVAL should
fix the problem, too.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-04 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-02 21:05 No ProbeResp - assume out of range Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-11-02 22:03 ` Michael Buesch
2008-11-02 22:29 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-11-02 22:52 ` Michael Buesch
2008-11-02 22:42 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-11-02 22:58 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-11-03 0:25 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-11-03 16:48 ` Felix Fietkau
2008-11-03 17:50 ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-04 5:32 ` Bharat Bhushan
2008-11-04 7:05 ` Kalle Valo
2008-11-04 6:58 ` Kalle Valo
2008-11-04 11:17 ` Michael Buesch
2008-11-04 12:43 ` Bob Copeland
2008-11-03 7:19 ` Kalle Valo
2008-11-02 22:33 ` Davide Pesavento
2008-11-04 18:19 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2008-11-04 19:15 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-11-05 10:30 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081104181958.GA22897@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).