From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.27]:25423 "EHLO ey-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754484AbYKJSmb (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:42:31 -0500 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 6so997729eyi.37 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:42:29 -0800 (PST) To: John Linville Subject: [PATCH 2/2] rt2x00: Move rt73usb register access wrappers into rt2x00usb Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:42:18 +0100 Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, rt2400-devel@lists.sourceforge.net References: <200811101941.40391.IvDoorn@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200811101941.40391.IvDoorn@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <200811101942.18478.IvDoorn@gmail.com> (sfid-20081110_194238_023344_8ECC0E8C) From: Ivo van Doorn Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: rt2500usb and rt73usb have different register word sizes, for that reason the register access wrappers were never moved into rt2x00usb. With rt2800usb on its way, we should favor the 32bit register access and move those wrappers into rt2x00usb. That saves duplicate code, since only rt2500usb will need the special 16bit wrappers. Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn --- http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/ivd/patches/0002-rt2x00-Move-rt73usb-register-access-wrappers-into-r.patch