From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] lib80211: absorb crypto bits from net/ieee80211
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:28:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081112182814.GD2411@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1226513943.16649.0.camel@brick>
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:19:03AM -0800, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 13:02 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:48:34AM -0800, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 16:51 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> > > > These bits are shared already between ipw2x00 and hostap, and could
> > > > probably be shared both more cleanly and with other drivers. This
> > > > commit simply relocates the code to lib80211 and adjusts the drivers
> > > > appropriately.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > Wouldn't it have been better to start from the mac80211 crypto bits
> > > as lib80211 and modify hostap/ipw2x00 to use the 'new' lib80211
> > > crypto bits?
> >
> > I'm sorry, but you forgot to attach your patches...
> >
>
> I will if it's desired, I just wanted to know if there was a particular
> reason for going this way.
Those bits are already shared between ieee80211 and the hostap driver.
Unfortunately, they are not shared with a clean API. I don't think
hacking on mac80211's crypto code is worthwhile until these drivers
are given a bit more discipline in this area. IMHO, this is the
better way to start.
Perhaps you should find something more helpful to do instead.
John
--
John W. Linville Linux should be at the core
linville@tuxdriver.com of your literate lifestyle.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-12 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-11 21:51 [RFC PATCH 1/4] lib80211: absorb crypto bits from net/ieee80211 John W. Linville
2008-11-11 21:51 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] lib80211: consolidate crypt init routines John W. Linville
2008-11-11 21:51 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] ipw2x00: relocate ipw2100/ipw2200 to common directory John W. Linville
2008-11-11 21:51 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] net/ieee80211 -> drivers/net/ipw2x00/libipw_* rename John W. Linville
2008-11-11 22:22 ` Michael Buesch
2008-11-11 23:21 ` John W. Linville
2008-11-12 3:27 ` Julian Calaby
2008-11-12 10:29 ` Michael Buesch
2008-11-12 10:39 ` Julian Calaby
2008-11-12 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] lib80211: absorb crypto bits from net/ieee80211 Harvey Harrison
2008-11-12 18:02 ` John W. Linville
2008-11-12 18:19 ` Harvey Harrison
2008-11-12 18:28 ` John W. Linville [this message]
2008-11-12 18:35 ` John W. Linville
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081112182814.GD2411@tuxdriver.com \
--to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).