linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Marcel Holtmann <holtmann@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Abhijeet Kolekar <abhijeet.kolekar@intel.com>,
	Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 2.6.28] iwlwifi : Fix channel scanning/association in 5Ghz band
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:29:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081112212900.GI2411@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081106134950.GB14184@tuxdriver.com>

On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 08:49:50AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 11:17:22PM +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> 
> >> This patch is related to bug 11870 at bugzilla.kernel.org. With
> >> correct regulatory information the number of channels to scan
> >> will be correct and not zero as seen in that bug.
> >>
> >> This patch eliminates the need for wireless to be compiled with
> >> CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY to get correct regulatory behavior with
> >> iwlwifi.
> >
> > so this is still for 2.6.28, but for 2.6.29 and wireless-testing the API 
> > changed and we need a separate or different patch.
> >
> > John, Dave what is your take on pushing this to Linus this late in the  
> > merge window? I personally think we should do that. And if not, then  
> > change the Intel wireless Kconfig to select  
> > CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY by default at least.
> 
> CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY is already 'default y' now.  I don't
> really see why iwlwifi should _require_ that if someone decides to
> choose a non-default configuration.

In case this was unclear, I'm dropping these patches for 2.6.28.
The original post said different patches are needed for -next anyway.

John
-- 
John W. Linville		Linux should be at the core
linville@tuxdriver.com			of your literate lifestyle.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-11-12 21:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-05 19:14 [PATCH 1/2 2.6.28] iwlwifi : Fix channel scanning/association in 5Ghz band Reinette Chatre
2008-11-05 19:14 ` [PATCH 2/2 2.6.28] iwl3945 " Reinette Chatre
2008-11-05 22:17 ` [PATCH 1/2 2.6.28] iwlwifi " Marcel Holtmann
2008-11-05 22:41   ` reinette chatre
2008-11-06  1:07   ` Zhu Yi
2008-11-06 13:49   ` John W. Linville
2008-11-06 14:37     ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-06 14:40       ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-06 14:47       ` Tomas Winkler
2008-11-06 14:51         ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-06 14:54           ` Tomas Winkler
2008-11-06 14:58             ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-06 15:08               ` Tomas Winkler
2008-11-12 21:29     ` John W. Linville [this message]
2008-11-12 21:45       ` reinette chatre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081112212900.GI2411@tuxdriver.com \
    --to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=abhijeet.kolekar@intel.com \
    --cc=holtmann@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).