From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Rami Rosen <ramirose@gmail.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"kune@deine-taler.de" <kune@deine-taler.de>,
Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ] zd1211rw: enable master mode. (wireless-testing)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:16:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081119211600.GE5900@tesla> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081119210046.GC5900@tesla>
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 01:00:46PM -0800, Luis Rodriguez wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 12:30:19PM -0800, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 11:01 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> >
> > > Is there some way we could take that into account? I'm sure there
> > > are users who would prefer to have an AP (i.e. their laptop) that
> > > can't support PS clients rather than not having an AP at all.
> >
> > That's a good question. The distinction here is between empowering users
> > to do the wrong thing (AP without proper PS support) and enforcing the
> > right thing (with the consequence of complete loss of AP functionality).
> > The issue I see here is that users will see "ohh shiny, AP support"
> > without knowing that it doesn't actually really support it. Not sure
> > which side of the line we want to stand on, I prefer the correctness
> > side but I can see arguments for the other side, would just like to have
> > users know. Maybe we could have some way to tell hostapd this and then
> > have hostapd print a huge warning about it when started up?
>
> How about making it Kconfigable for broken AP support and add the
> warning there?
That is have something like CONFIG_MAC80211_AP_HALF_ASSED
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-19 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-17 15:51 [PATCH ] zd1211rw: enable master mode. (wireless-testing) Rami Rosen
2008-11-17 17:40 ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-19 13:59 ` Rami Rosen
2008-11-19 14:49 ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-19 15:09 ` Rami Rosen
2008-11-19 15:17 ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-19 16:01 ` John W. Linville
2008-11-19 20:30 ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-19 21:00 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-11-19 21:16 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2008-11-20 15:33 ` Michael Buesch
2008-11-19 21:18 ` John W. Linville
2008-11-20 6:37 ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-20 8:27 ` Jouni Malinen
2008-11-20 17:52 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081119211600.GE5900@tesla \
--to=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
--cc=j@w1.fi \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kune@deine-taler.de \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=ramirose@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).