From: Fabio Rossi <rossi.f@inwind.it>
To: "Bob Copeland" <me@bobcopeland.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ath5k: problems during the connection to a sitecom AP
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:33:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200811221733.56583.rossi.f@inwind.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b6c5339f0811211222t745c65fve38958c9baa98e46@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday 21 November 2008, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Fabio Rossi <rossi.f@inwind.it> wrote:
> > I've attached a kernel log of what's happening and a commands log with
> > time references. I hope it's useful, tell me if you need other data.
>
> Ok, well at least we know we see beacons from the AP in question.
> Other than that, it doesn't help a whole lot, as all the log captured
> was beacons from various APs. Can you try again without the 'trace'
> option? Also if you turn on CONFIG_MAC80211_VERBOSE_DEBUG then we
> can see the probe requests etc.
CONFIG_MAC80211_VERBOSE_DEBUG was already set in the previous log (I
used "echo -n "all" > /debug/ath5k/phy1/debug"). The problem is that there
are no direct probe requests, the card doesn't transmit at all (there are no
TX dumps).
I have compared the logs with the two access points (both are configured in
the same way, no SSID broadcast, WEP and 802.11b&g mode). With the 3com AP at
a certain point I see the following lines (with TX and RX dumps not reported
here):
kernel: ath0: direct probe to AP 00:0d:54:fb:55:33 try 1
kernel: ath0 direct probe responded
kernel: ath0: authenticate with AP 00:0d:54:fb:55:33
kernel: ath0: authenticated
kernel: ath0: associate with AP 00:0d:54:fb:55:33
kernel: ath0: RX AssocResp from 00:0d:54:fb:55:33 (capab=0x431 status=0 aid=5)
kernel: ath0: associated
kernel: phy14: Allocated STA 00:0d:54:fb:55:33
kernel: phy14: Inserted STA 00:0d:54:fb:55:33
while with the Sitecom AP I see nothing similar.
I have also tried a PCMCIA card which uses the rtl8180 driver. The result is
the same, I can associate to the 3com AP but not to the Sitecom one.
I'm suspecting that it's not an ath5k driver issue but an higher level issue
in the mac80211 framework.
When I do a scan after having loaded the driver, the iwlist can't report the
SSID because it's hidden. I don't know if this is a problem but I have
noticed that the reported SSIDs of the two APs are a little bit different.
With the 3com AP (the working one) I get ESSID:" " (1 char blank
string) while with the Sitecom AP ESSID:"" (0 chars empty string).
> If you do have another wireless card, that would still be better. You
> can use it like this:
>
> # ifconfig wlan1 down
> # iwconfig wlan1 mode monitor
> # ifconfig wlan1 up
> # tcpdump -s 1000 -w assoc.cap -i wlan1
>
> Then you can load assoc.cap into wireshark (you can capture from inside
> wireshark too if you prefer).
Now I'm able to use a second additional PCMCIA wireless card in RFmon mode.
The capturing confirms that there is no network traffic generated by the
ath5k wireless card during the authentication & association with the Sitecom
AP (no packets with the source MAC address of the wireless card).
Regards,
Fabio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-22 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-15 1:07 ath5k: problems during the connection to a sitecom AP Fabio Rossi
2008-11-17 20:20 ` Fabio Rossi
2008-11-17 20:23 ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-19 21:00 ` Fabio Rossi
2008-11-20 6:40 ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-18 15:48 ` Bob Copeland
2008-11-19 22:15 ` Fabio Rossi
2008-11-21 20:22 ` Bob Copeland
2008-11-22 16:33 ` Fabio Rossi [this message]
2008-11-24 8:31 ` Holger Schurig
2008-11-25 0:08 ` Fabio Rossi
2008-11-24 8:25 ` Holger Schurig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-11-24 9:35 rossi.f
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200811221733.56583.rossi.f@inwind.it \
--to=rossi.f@inwind.it \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@bobcopeland.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).