Re: [ath5k-devel] License of changes to ath5k/ath9k

["Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>]

On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 01:29:55PM -0800, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> <lrodriguez@atheros.com> wrote:
> > We'll keep using the ath5k Changes-licensed-under tag until we get
> > advice from SFLC if we have done enough to ensure this is no longer
> > necessary. For ath9k, if we are not sure if you have read the
> > "Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1" we may ping you with an e-mail
> > just to be sure.
> 
> I don't consider any of my changes significant enough to confer copyright,
> so by my Signed-off-by, I agree that whatever license the file currently
> has is alright by me.  Even if the changes were significant, the previous
> holds.
> 
> However, if everyone + SFLC prefers that we strictly use
> Changes-licensed-under even if we don't claim copyright, then I'll
> happily add the tag generator script to a git commit hook :)

Sure, BTW I had created such a script a long time ago, the files just
need to be updated (so update them if you download this thingy):

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mcgrof/scripts/ath5k-license.pl.txt

Understood.

  Luis