From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.atheros.com ([12.36.123.2]:46313 "EHLO mail.atheros.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751562AbYKYW2Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:28:16 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:28:14 -0800 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: Bob Copeland CC: Luis Rodriguez , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" , "ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org" , "bkuhn@softwarefreedom.org" Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] License of changes to ath5k/ath9k Message-ID: <20081125222814.GG5950@tesla> (sfid-20081125_232820_742843_B6EA7BAC) References: <20081125210421.GF5950@tesla> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 01:29:55PM -0800, Bob Copeland wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez > wrote: > > We'll keep using the ath5k Changes-licensed-under tag until we get > > advice from SFLC if we have done enough to ensure this is no longer > > necessary. For ath9k, if we are not sure if you have read the > > "Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1" we may ping you with an e-mail > > just to be sure. > > I don't consider any of my changes significant enough to confer copyright, > so by my Signed-off-by, I agree that whatever license the file currently > has is alright by me. Even if the changes were significant, the previous > holds. > > However, if everyone + SFLC prefers that we strictly use > Changes-licensed-under even if we don't claim copyright, then I'll > happily add the tag generator script to a git commit hook :) Sure, BTW I had created such a script a long time ago, the files just need to be updated (so update them if you download this thingy): http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mcgrof/scripts/ath5k-license.pl.txt Understood. Luis