linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harald Braumann <harry@unheit.net>
To: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, ipw2100-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	yi.zhu@intel.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Ipw2100-devel] [PATCH] ipw2200: increase scan timeout
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:17:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081125231735.5c9f7a50@sbs173> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200811251809.55461.helmut.schaa@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 984 bytes --]

On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 18:09:54 +0100
Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> wrote:

> The current scan timeout is set to 5 seconds. If the timeout is hit
> because the firmware did not respond yet, the adapter gets restarted,
> which results in a disassociation.

Could this be a workaround for my bug as well (disconnects caused by
scan while associated)? I get the following log entries:

I isr_status_change Scan detected while associated, with no scan
request.  Restarting firmware. 
I schedule_reset wifi0: Scheduling firmware restart (0s). 
I isr_status_change Status change: IPW_STATE_SCANNING 
I isr_indicate_scanning Scanning... 
U ipw2100_reset_adapter : wifi0: Restarting adapter. 
U ipw2100_power_cycle_adapter Power cycling the hardware.

> However, in an environment with lots of access points the scan
> sometimes takes longer than 5 seconds. This patch simply increases
> the timeout to 10 seconds.

I only have 1 AP, though.

Cheer,
harry

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-11-25 22:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-25 17:09 [PATCH] ipw2200: increase scan timeout Helmut Schaa
2008-11-25 18:32 ` reinette chatre
2008-11-25 22:06   ` [Ipw2100-devel] " Cahill, Ben M
2008-11-26  8:21   ` Helmut Schaa
2008-11-26 16:28   ` Helmut Schaa
2008-11-25 19:35 ` Dan Williams
2008-11-26  8:19   ` Helmut Schaa
2008-11-25 22:17 ` Harald Braumann [this message]
2008-11-26  8:13   ` [Ipw2100-devel] " Helmut Schaa
2008-11-26  7:06 ` Holger Schurig
2008-11-26  7:24   ` Kalle Valo
2008-11-26  8:04     ` Zhu Yi
2008-11-26 16:19       ` Dan Williams
2008-11-26  8:09   ` Helmut Schaa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081125231735.5c9f7a50@sbs173 \
    --to=harry@unheit.net \
    --cc=helmut.schaa@googlemail.com \
    --cc=ipw2100-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).