From: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
To: Holger Schurig <hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>,
linville@tuxdriver.com, yi.zhu@intel.com,
reinette.chatre@intel.com, ipw2100-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipw2200: increase scan timeout
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:09:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200811260909.11175.helmut.schaa@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200811260706.03160.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2008 schrieb Holger Schurig:
> > The current scan timeout is set to 5 seconds. If the timeout
> > is hit because the firmware did not respond yet, the adapter
> > gets restarted, which results in a disassociation.
>
> I have nothing against raising the timeout, but two general
> questions.
>
> First thing: why does the adapter get's resetted?
I guess the intention was that if the firmware does not get back within the
timeout it might have been crashed (or something similar) and thus the driver
simply restarts the card.
> Even if a
> whole scan takes 11 seconds, the scan of one channel takes less.
> So if results trickle in during these 11 seconds, nothing should
> get resettet.
Right. Could do that too.
> Second thing: why should the association get's cleared if the
> adapter get's reset? Isn't one a (assoc) at protocol level and
> the other (adapter) a hardware thing?
No idea!
Helmut
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-26 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-25 17:09 [PATCH] ipw2200: increase scan timeout Helmut Schaa
2008-11-25 18:32 ` reinette chatre
2008-11-25 22:06 ` [Ipw2100-devel] " Cahill, Ben M
2008-11-26 8:21 ` Helmut Schaa
2008-11-26 16:28 ` Helmut Schaa
2008-11-25 19:35 ` Dan Williams
2008-11-26 8:19 ` Helmut Schaa
2008-11-25 22:17 ` [Ipw2100-devel] " Harald Braumann
2008-11-26 8:13 ` Helmut Schaa
2008-11-26 7:06 ` Holger Schurig
2008-11-26 7:24 ` Kalle Valo
2008-11-26 8:04 ` Zhu Yi
2008-11-26 16:19 ` Dan Williams
2008-11-26 8:09 ` Helmut Schaa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200811260909.11175.helmut.schaa@gmail.com \
--to=helmut.schaa@googlemail.com \
--cc=hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de \
--cc=ipw2100-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).