From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:40143 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762054AbYLCUdW (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2008 15:33:22 -0500 Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 12:32:15 -0800 From: Greg KH To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: "John W. Linville" , sfr@canb.auug.org.au, ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] [stable] [PATCH 1/3] ath9k: Handle -ENOMEM on RX gracefully Message-ID: <20081203203215.GA30927@kroah.com> (sfid-20081203_213336_251267_04E676D3) References: <1228251082-11677-1-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <1228251082-11677-2-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <1228251082-11677-3-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <1228251082-11677-4-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <20081203001253.GC14943@kroah.com> <43e72e890812021620lccafachbd8e781d283095b7@mail.gmail.com> <20081203002404.GA22789@tuxdriver.com> <43e72e890812031219t6a8c0d57hf54f376730a0655c@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <43e72e890812031219t6a8c0d57hf54f376730a0655c@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:19:22PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:24 PM, John W. Linville wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 04:20:32PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Greg KH wrote: > >> > I don't see this patch upstream in Linus's tree. Am I just missing it > >> > and if so, do you know the git commit id? > >> > >> Nope sorry, John has yet to send his pending-fixes branch to davem and > >> so forth, which would contain it AFAICT. Please correct me if I'm > >> wrong John. > > > > It has been sent, and Dave sent his pull request to Linus today > > (or maybe yesterday). I'll try to dig-up the commit IDs tomorrow. > > Greg, I see two of these patches in 2.6.27-stable review patch but the > one in this subject was not applied, any specific reason or was it > just missed? It was not applied because it was not yet in Linus's tree, which is a requirement for it to go into the 2.6.27-stable tree. thanks, greg k-h