linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Henning Rogge <rogge@fgan.de>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>,
	Luis Rodriguez <Luis.Rodriguez@atheros.com>,
	Henning Rogge <hrogge@googlemail.com>,
	Marcel Holtmann <holtmann@linux.intel.com>,
	"linux-wireless" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"nbd@openwrt.org" <nbd@openwrt.org>
Subject: Re: RFC Patch v2: Add signal strength to nl80211station info
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:34:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200812050934.07182.rogge@fgan.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1228425635.5692.49.camel@johannes.berg>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2844 bytes --]

Am Thursday 04 December 2008 22:20:35 schrieb Johannes Berg:
> On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 13:12 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > It seems that's the case for ath9k, at least Jouni had pointed out to me.
>
> They cannot, we don't even have that in the API.
Ath9k has it's ***_ratetable which contains a line of data for each 
transmission range. 20/40Mhz and guard interval is already contained in this 
table (encoded in "phy" variable). Just the MCS number is missing.

And I think the intel driver has the necessary data too. If I understand the 
iwl5000 driver, it pushes the rate index (even for 802.11n) through 
ieee80211_rx_status into mac80211.

> > > then we also don't need the values for the number of streams since
> > > those are perfect multiples (1x, 2x, 3x, 4x for up to 4 streams).
> >
> > Well if you have the MCS index and HT mode you get the # of streams. Not
> > sure I understood the perfect multiple stuff.
>
> Right, but you don't need to store a bitrate for MCS 0, 8, 16 and 24,
> the latter three can just use the first multiplied by 2, 3 and 4
> respectively.
When I looked at the table in the wiki I noticed it cannot be created just by 
a little bit arithmetric ? Maybe someone can look at the 802.11 draft if we 
don't need the tables at all but just use a formula ? If yes we could remove 
them from kernelspace and just add a macro for calculating the rate into a 
userspace-accessable header file.

> > > Just had another idea. Since we'll end up duplicating these for TX and
> > > RX (ultimately we'll need RX_BITRATE_40_MHZ/MCS/SGI etc too) we should
> > > actually do this differently:
> > >
> > >  1) define NL80211_STA_INFO_RATE,
> > >  2) define NL80211_RATE_INFO_BITRATE/40/MCS/SGI
> > >
> > > and then nest the bitrate information into the STA_INFO_RATE, just like
> > > station flags are nested etc. That way the RATE_INFO things could also
> > > be used elsewhere.
> >
> > So we'll have to add an enum then too to distinguish which rate this is
> > for.
>
> No, we know that based on what "container" attribute it's contained in,
> in netlink.
So it's possible to define a substructure in the station info in nl80211 ? 
Sounds like a nice way to construct the tx/rx rate.

I will see if I get a "v6" patch ready during the weekend.

Henning

*************************************************
Diplom Informatiker Henning Rogge
Forschungsgesellschaft für
Angewandte Naturwissenschaften e. V. (FGAN) 
Neuenahrer Str. 20, 53343 Wachtberg, Germany
Tel.: 0049 (0)228 9435-961
Fax: 0049 (0)228 9435-685
E-Mail: rogge@fgan.de
Web: www.fgan.de
************************************************
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bonn
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Bonn VR 2530
Vorstand: Dr. rer. nat. Ralf Dornhaus (Vors.), Prof. Dr. Joachim Ender 
(Stellv.)


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-05  8:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-25 20:31 RFC Patch: Add signal strength to nl80211station info Henning Rogge
2008-11-25 20:47 ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-25 21:01   ` Henning Rogge
2008-11-26  5:21   ` Marcel Holtmann
2008-11-26  8:32     ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-26 16:17     ` Henning Rogge
2008-11-29 10:50     ` RFC Patch v2: " Henning Rogge
2008-12-01 11:17       ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-01 13:22         ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-01 17:39           ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-12-01 17:45             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-12-01 17:53             ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-02 13:25             ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-02 20:29               ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-12-02 20:46                 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-03  1:44                   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-12-03 10:31                     ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-04  8:47                       ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-04  9:48                         ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-04 13:02                           ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-04 20:26                       ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-04 21:12                         ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-12-04 21:20                           ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-05  8:34                             ` Henning Rogge [this message]
2008-12-05  9:45                               ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-05  9:51                                 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-05  9:54                                   ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-05 23:26                                     ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-06  9:15                                       ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-06 11:12                                         ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-06 14:10                                 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-06 14:43                                   ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-06 14:51                                   ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-06 15:03                                     ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-06 15:46                                       ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-06 15:59                                         ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-06 16:08                                           ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-06 20:46                                           ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-12-07 17:32                                             ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-07 17:39                                               ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-07 18:17                                                 ` [PATCH 1/2] Add signal strength and bandwith " Henning Rogge
2008-12-08 19:43                                                   ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-09 19:50                                                     ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-09 21:16                                                       ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-10  6:53                                                         ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-10  9:05                                                           ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-10 17:40                                                             ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-10 20:45                                                               ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-10 20:58                                                                 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-10 21:01                                                                   ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-11 17:07                                                                     ` [Patch] nl80211: " Henning Rogge
2008-12-11 17:24                                                                       ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-11 18:02                                                                         ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-11 18:14                                                                           ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-11 18:22                                                                             ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-11 18:28                                                                               ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-11 20:10                                                                                 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-11 20:24                                                                                   ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-11 20:12                                                                                 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-11 20:23                                                                                   ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-09 19:54                                                     ` [Patch 1/2 v2] " Henning Rogge
2008-12-09 19:58                                                     ` [Patch 2/2 " Henning Rogge
2008-12-09 21:19                                                       ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-07 18:19                                                 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Henning Rogge
2008-12-07 18:20                                                 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Henning Rogge
2008-12-06 15:48                                       ` RFC Patch v2: Add signal strength " Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200812050934.07182.rogge@fgan.de \
    --to=rogge@fgan.de \
    --cc=Luis.Rodriguez@atheros.com \
    --cc=holtmann@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hrogge@googlemail.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
    --cc=nbd@openwrt.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).