From: Henning Rogge <hrogge@googlemail.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Henning Rogge <rogge@fgan.de>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>,
Luis Rodriguez <Luis.Rodriguez@atheros.com>,
Marcel Holtmann <holtmann@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-wireless" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"nbd@openwrt.org" <nbd@openwrt.org>
Subject: Re: RFC Patch v2: Add signal strength to nl80211station info
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 17:08:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200812061708.32369.hrogge@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1228579172.16752.21.camel@johannes.berg>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 919 bytes --]
On Saturday 06 December 2008 16:59:32 Johannes Berg wrote:
> For one, I'm a bit concerned that the calculation is fairly complex, and
> may not always be necessary; especially divisions can be expensive on
> some CPUs.
What if I push the calculation into nl80211.c, so it will be only called when
the a userspace process requests the station info ? This would mean the
calculation is not done at all until someone needs the rate info.
> Also, there are duplicate numbers possible, so just the pure bitrate
> will _not_ actually be "the typical information" because it's not
> specific enough, when debugging, for example, you will probably need to
> know whether it's short-gi or not.
Don't you think the normal nl80211 use will just be a display of "how fast are
we doing at the moment" ? Most applications don't even need to set a rate,
they just want to show the user some feedback.
Henning
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-06 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-25 20:31 RFC Patch: Add signal strength to nl80211station info Henning Rogge
2008-11-25 20:47 ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-25 21:01 ` Henning Rogge
2008-11-26 5:21 ` Marcel Holtmann
2008-11-26 8:32 ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-26 16:17 ` Henning Rogge
2008-11-29 10:50 ` RFC Patch v2: " Henning Rogge
2008-12-01 11:17 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-01 13:22 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-01 17:39 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-12-01 17:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-12-01 17:53 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-02 13:25 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-02 20:29 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-12-02 20:46 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-03 1:44 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-12-03 10:31 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-04 8:47 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-04 9:48 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-04 13:02 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-04 20:26 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-04 21:12 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-12-04 21:20 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-05 8:34 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-05 9:45 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-05 9:51 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-05 9:54 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-05 23:26 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-06 9:15 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-06 11:12 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-06 14:10 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-06 14:43 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-06 14:51 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-06 15:03 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-06 15:46 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-06 15:59 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-06 16:08 ` Henning Rogge [this message]
2008-12-06 20:46 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-12-07 17:32 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-07 17:39 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-07 18:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] Add signal strength and bandwith " Henning Rogge
2008-12-08 19:43 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-09 19:50 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-09 21:16 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-10 6:53 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-10 9:05 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-10 17:40 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-10 20:45 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-10 20:58 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-10 21:01 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-11 17:07 ` [Patch] nl80211: " Henning Rogge
2008-12-11 17:24 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-11 18:02 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-11 18:14 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-11 18:22 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-11 18:28 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-11 20:10 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-11 20:24 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-11 20:12 ` Henning Rogge
2008-12-11 20:23 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-09 19:54 ` [Patch 1/2 v2] " Henning Rogge
2008-12-09 19:58 ` [Patch 2/2 " Henning Rogge
2008-12-09 21:19 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-07 18:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Henning Rogge
2008-12-07 18:20 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Henning Rogge
2008-12-06 15:48 ` RFC Patch v2: Add signal strength " Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200812061708.32369.hrogge@googlemail.com \
--to=hrogge@googlemail.com \
--cc=Luis.Rodriguez@atheros.com \
--cc=holtmann@linux.intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
--cc=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=rogge@fgan.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).