From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de,
hmh@hmh.eng.br
Subject: Re: [RFC] b43: rework rfkill code
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:51:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081210175102.GA14282@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1228930643.15837.48.camel@johannes.berg>
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 06:37:23PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Ok. I think the fundamental flaw here is assuming that there's just a
> single state. There isn't. The device can be turned off in hardware (in
> which case sw won't be able do anything about it, but we want to know)
> or in software (which we want to handle). Pretending that there's just a
> single state that's either hw-off, sw-off or on is plain wrong. The
> device can be hw-off and sw-off at the same time, and then if you turn
> off the hw-off button it won't turn on (however, unless your system
> integrator totally screwed up, you won't have a hw and a sw button on
> your system)
They may not be physical buttons, but we can often control this anyway.
For instance, my HP has a button that will perform a hardware disable of
the wifi card. However, I can control that button's state through
software with the hp-wmi driver. The way we currently handle that (and,
I think, the only way we *can* handle that) is to provide two separate
rfkill interfaces - one tied to the wireless device, one tied to the
platform device.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-10 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-10 15:09 [RFC] b43: rework rfkill code Matthew Garrett
2008-12-10 15:29 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-10 16:15 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-12-10 16:51 ` Marcel Holtmann
2008-12-10 17:18 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-10 17:23 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-10 17:28 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-10 21:33 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-12-10 21:42 ` Michael Buesch
2008-12-10 17:31 ` Michael Buesch
2008-12-10 17:37 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-10 17:51 ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2008-12-10 18:04 ` Michael Buesch
2008-12-10 18:05 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-10 18:09 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-12-10 18:29 ` Dan Williams
2008-12-10 18:33 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-10 18:59 ` Dan Williams
2008-12-10 20:07 ` Michael Buesch
2009-03-29 18:19 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-11 0:32 ` Julian Calaby
2008-12-11 1:27 ` Michael Buesch
2008-12-11 13:28 ` Kalle Valo
2008-12-10 15:48 ` Michael Buesch
2008-12-10 16:12 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-12-11 16:55 ` Larry Finger
2008-12-12 4:28 ` Larry Finger
2008-12-17 15:48 ` John W. Linville
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081210175102.GA14282@srcf.ucam.org \
--to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).