Re: [RFC] b43: rework rfkill code

[Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>]

On Wednesday 10 December 2008 22:33:34 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 18:23 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > Then there's user_claim_unsupported which is set by all drivers but
> > > rt2x00, probably because they have hardware kill switches and thus they
> > > have to set it even if it's not strictly true, because of the lacking
> > > separation between these things (that I pointed out)
> > 
> > IOW, correct me if I'm wrong, it seems to me that user_claim_unsupported
> > really is a wrong name for "has hw kill", which could be avoided if sw
> 
> I never understood what user_claim_unsupported is for.  I left it alone
> because of that, but it looks like some artifact of the old rfkill that did
> horrible things to the input layer.

No, as I just explained. It comes from a time when we didn't have all that input stuff at all.
It was a workaround. rfkill basically had a facility to change the hardware rfkill state from
userspace. As b43 does not support that, I introduced the flag.
Today we have three states (which is still broken, but you saw the rest of the thread...), so I guess
we can remove it again.
We cannot change the hardware state. That's what the flag is (was) for.

-- 
Greetings, Michael.