From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
To: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de>
Cc: wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT] p54: regulatory domain hint
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 07:55:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081222155538.GE11083@tesla> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200812212336.31267.chunkeey@web.de>
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 02:36:30PM -0800, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> This patch adds a sub-routine that parses the default country eeprom entry
> and forwards the obtained Alpha2 identifier to the regulatory sub-system.
>
> Luis,
>
> I've a question about the regulatory domain numbers. (ref: 802.11-2007 14.8.2.2)
> As far as I can see zd1211rw driver (zd_mac.c) uses them to determine the country as well.
> So, how should I/we deal with this?
Since two drivers are using the same maps I'd say go ahead and consolidate the maps.
Keep in mind that 802.11-2007 14.8.2.2 is not complete and for the rest of the countries
vendors have used different values. Special values like 0x41 maybe be standard amongst a
few vendors but then what alpha2 do we map this to? Do we make an exception, create a J2
in the regulatory db? I'd be inclined that we only add special codes for things for which
we are sure we can be used in a country. An alternative is to use the reg_notifier() in
those drivers so that if 0x41 was used, after cfg80211 is done updating the channels we
can override the settings and disable channel 14. ETSI is another special case -- are we
OK to always use "DE" for it?
> Would you support a common helper function with a fixed list - like the one in zd_mac.c (or in this patch) -
> which takes regDomain values and converts them into alpha2?
That seems to make sense since > 1 driver is using it. In fact I think bcm can use this too?
I know ath5k/ath9k can use it too but we have a lot more country codes too so we will need a
larger map table for all the other values. We can probably still make use of it in ath5k/ath9k
and if there is no match then use our internal table for a larger set.
> Or do you have a secret plan instead?
Heh why would it be secret?
Luis
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-22 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-21 22:36 [RFC/RFT] p54: regulatory domain hint Christian Lamparter
2008-12-21 23:17 ` Larry Finger
2008-12-22 15:55 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081222155538.GE11083@tesla \
--to=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
--cc=chunkeey@web.de \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).