From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
To: Piter PUNK <piterpunk@unitednerds.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rt2500usb vs rt73usb
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 10:34:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200812281034.07373.IvDoorn@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49571E29.8060204@unitednerds.org>
On Sunday 28 December 2008, Piter PUNK wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have three rt2573 wireless devices:
>
> . TP-Link WN321G
> . D-Link DWA-110
> . Built-in inside Intel ClassmatePC
>
> The D-Link device loads only the rt73usb module and
> works really fine. The other two loads rt73usb AND
> rt2500usb. The correct module for all is rt73usb.
>
> Loading rt2500usb AND rt73usb don't have any functional
> problem. All wireless devices works fine. But is very
> annoying the additional modules loaded.
>
> Both modules are loaded because both handle 148f:2573
> devices. Of course my universe is very small, only two
> devices, but... devices 148f:2573 that works with
> rt2500usb exists? Those devices can work with rt73usb?
rt2500usb and rt73usb drivers are for different chipsets,
so when rt73usb works for a particular chip the rt2500usb
driver will not work for that same chip.
> If the those 148f:2573 USB devices doesn't exists or
> if they exists and works fine with rt73usb, can we
> remove 148f:2573 from rt2500usb?
No we can't, you can blame manufacturers for shipping
USB sticks with different chipsets but the exact same USB ID.
Ivo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-28 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-28 6:35 rt2500usb vs rt73usb Piter PUNK
2008-12-28 9:34 ` Ivo van Doorn [this message]
2008-12-28 22:14 ` Pavel Roskin
2008-12-28 22:32 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-12-28 22:44 ` Luis Correia
2009-01-06 20:27 ` John W. Linville
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200812281034.07373.IvDoorn@gmail.com \
--to=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=piterpunk@unitednerds.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).