From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:51197 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758424AbZAHTAn (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jan 2009 14:00:43 -0500 Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:50:47 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" To: Andrew Price Cc: Ivo Van Doorn , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt2x00: Fix radio LED type check Message-ID: <20090108185047.GC3861@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20090108_200047_015749_6CD64045) References: <20090102080527.GA16585@silver.sucs.org> <20090108181035.GA27377@silver.sucs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20090108181035.GA27377@silver.sucs.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 06:10:35PM +0000, Andrew Price wrote: > On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 12:14:17PM +0100, Ivo Van Doorn wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Andrew Price wrote: > > > Since commit 9a95dba32735534bda59def40c747bf606fedf05 "rt2x00: Fix LED > > > state handling", rt2x00leds_led_radio wrongly checks that the LED type > > > is LED_TYPE_ASSOC. This patch makes it check for LED_TYPE_RADIO once > > > again. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Price > > > > Good catch. Thanks. > > > > Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn > > Thanks for that. I'm a little new to this so I'm not sure what happens now. > Will the patch go into John's tree and make it's way to Linus' tree (where the > bug is) or should I send it directly to Linus/LKML with Ivo's Acked-by line? I've got it, thanks. John -- John W. Linville Linux should be at the core linville@tuxdriver.com of your literate lifestyle.