Re: [PATCH 10/13] cfg80211: remove check for last_request on ignore_reg_update()

["Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>]

On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 01:26:30AM -0800, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 16:12 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > There is no need to check for last_request as the callers of
> > update_all_wiphy_regulatory() ensure its present.
> 
> Are you sure? I had all this blow up all around me.

Interesting -- well that's the thing, where and why would it have blown up?
I did test it and didn't run into it.

  Luis

> > Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
> > ---
> >  net/wireless/reg.c |    2 --
> >  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/wireless/reg.c b/net/wireless/reg.c
> > index 8bf999d..6c45832 100644
> > --- a/net/wireless/reg.c
> > +++ b/net/wireless/reg.c
> > @@ -1006,8 +1006,6 @@ static void handle_band_custom(struct wiphy *wiphy, enum ieee80211_band band,
> >  
> >  static bool ignore_reg_update(struct wiphy *wiphy, enum reg_set_by setby)
> >  {
> > -	if (!last_request)
> > -		return true;
> >  	if (setby == REGDOM_SET_BY_CORE &&
> >  		  wiphy->custom_regulatory)
> >  		return true;