* Invalid JP regulatory domain
@ 2009-01-26 19:30 Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
2009-01-26 23:16 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski @ 2009-01-26 19:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-wireless
Hi,
While trying to set JP as regulatory domain I get in my kernel log:
cfg80211: Calling CRDA for country: JP
cfg80211: Invalid regulatory domain detected:
cfg80211: Regulatory domain: JP
(start_freq - end_freq @ bandwidth), (max_antenna_gain, max_eirp)
(2402000 KHz - 2472000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (N/A, 2000 mBm)
(2457000 KHz - 2482000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (N/A, 2000 mBm)
(2474000 KHz - 2494000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (N/A, 2000 mBm)
(4910000 KHz - 4930000 KHz @ 10000 KHz), (N/A, 2300 mBm)
(4910000 KHz - 4990000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (N/A, 2300 mBm)
(4930000 KHz - 4950000 KHz @ 10000 KHz), (N/A, 2300 mBm)
(5030000 KHz - 5045000 KHz @ 10000 KHz), (N/A, 2300 mBm)
(5030000 KHz - 5090000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (N/A, 2300 mBm)
(5050000 KHz - 5060000 KHz @ 10000 KHz), (N/A, 2300 mBm)
(5170000 KHz - 5250000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (N/A, 2000 mBm)
(5250000 KHz - 5330000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (N/A, 2000 mBm)
(5490000 KHz - 5710000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (N/A, 2300 mBm)
Looks like the check "freq_range->max_bandwidth_khz > freq_diff" fails in
net/wireless/reg.c (is_valid_reg_rule function) for the second and third
ranges. Got this with wireless-regdb-2009-01-15 and kernel 2.6.28.1
Is there some error in regulatory domain ranges for JP, or kernel check
missing something additional? I couldn't find proper information about the
rules.
--
[]'s
Herton
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: Invalid JP regulatory domain
2009-01-26 19:30 Invalid JP regulatory domain Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
@ 2009-01-26 23:16 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2009-01-26 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski; +Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:30:28AM -0800, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While trying to set JP as regulatory domain I get in my kernel log:
> cfg80211: Calling CRDA for country: JP
> cfg80211: Invalid regulatory domain detected:
> cfg80211: Regulatory domain: JP
> (start_freq - end_freq @ bandwidth), (max_antenna_gain, max_eirp)
> (2402000 KHz - 2472000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (N/A, 2000 mBm)
> (2457000 KHz - 2482000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (N/A, 2000 mBm)
> (2474000 KHz - 2494000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (N/A, 2000 mBm)
> (4910000 KHz - 4930000 KHz @ 10000 KHz), (N/A, 2300 mBm)
> (4910000 KHz - 4990000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (N/A, 2300 mBm)
> (4930000 KHz - 4950000 KHz @ 10000 KHz), (N/A, 2300 mBm)
> (5030000 KHz - 5045000 KHz @ 10000 KHz), (N/A, 2300 mBm)
> (5030000 KHz - 5090000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (N/A, 2300 mBm)
> (5050000 KHz - 5060000 KHz @ 10000 KHz), (N/A, 2300 mBm)
> (5170000 KHz - 5250000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (N/A, 2000 mBm)
> (5250000 KHz - 5330000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (N/A, 2000 mBm)
> (5490000 KHz - 5710000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (N/A, 2300 mBm)
>
> Looks like the check "freq_range->max_bandwidth_khz > freq_diff" fails in
> net/wireless/reg.c (is_valid_reg_rule function) for the second and third
> ranges. Got this with wireless-regdb-2009-01-15 and kernel 2.6.28.1
>
> Is there some error in regulatory domain ranges for JP, or kernel check
> missing something additional?
You are right, the bandwidth was the issue, I'll send a patch now. Thanks for
reporting this!
> I couldn't find proper information about the
> rules.
I'll try add documentation for that, thanks.
Luis
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-26 23:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-01-26 19:30 Invalid JP regulatory domain Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
2009-01-26 23:16 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).