From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Hin-Tak Leung <hintak.leung@gmail.com>
Cc: Ismael Ojeda Perez <iojedaperez@gmail.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: zd1211rw NEW RF Type
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:15:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090204161502.GD3845@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3ace41890902040750v61e42579h945e6f9fb70d575d@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 03:50:55PM +0000, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:18 PM, John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
>
> >> You probably don't hang out in the right place... two people on the
> >> sourceforge zd1211 mailing list recently reported that
> >> MAXIM_NEW_RF=0x08 is just the same as UW2453_RF=0x09 ; and one of
>
> > Or someone can send a patch with a report that it is working for them
> > and I'll just merge it... :-)
>
> The patch and success report was posted to the sourceforge zd1211
> mailing list 2 weeks ago - it is actually in the mailing list archive
> ( http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=zd1211-devs
> , 2nd item from top) I think Daniel Drake and a few of the zd1211rw
> people are on that list . For slightly controversial(?) change like
> this - comparing to just adding vendor+product ids - it is probably
> more appropriate if/when one of them decide to put it in...
This doesn't seem any more contorversial than a USB ID to me...?
> It is likely that 0x08 is just an older 0x09, so it is probably more
> appropriate to put the 0x08 RF id before, rather than after the 0x09
> case as in the posted patch to the zd1211 mailing list.
ACK on the style note.
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-04 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <a4c529250902040227g35a375fdu35c2360f0916dba6@mail.gmail.com>
2009-02-04 10:43 ` zd1211rw NEW RF Type Ismael Ojeda Perez
2009-02-04 14:47 ` John W. Linville
2009-02-04 15:17 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-02-04 15:18 ` John W. Linville
2009-02-04 15:50 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-02-04 16:15 ` John W. Linville [this message]
2009-02-04 19:32 ` Ismael Ojeda Perez
2009-02-04 19:43 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-02-04 19:47 ` Gábor Stefanik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090204161502.GD3845@tuxdriver.com \
--to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=hintak.leung@gmail.com \
--cc=iojedaperez@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox