linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adam Baker <linux@baker-net.org.uk>
To: rt2400-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Anders Eriksson <aeriksson@fastmail.fm>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Rt2400-devel] No ProbeResp == dead interface?
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:16:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200902192316.11628.linux@baker-net.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090218205849.5723293CD93@tippex.mynet.homeunix.org>

On Wednesday 18 February 2009, Anders Eriksson wrote:
> Every so often I get in syslog:
> wlan0: No ProbeResp from current AP 00:18:39:c0:5f:50 - assume out of range
>
> After that the interface carries no more traffic and the onlly way I've
> found to revive the card is to power cycle the machine.
> /etc/iniit.d/net.wlan restart does not work, and "ifconfig wlan0 up ;
> iwlist scan" shows no results. Is there another way to revive the card?

The first thing to try would be to see if rmmod rt61pci; modprobe rt61pci is 
enough to recover it. If it is actually a cardbus card then you could also 
try unplugging and replugging it.

Neither of those is an ideal solution though. Do you fancy the task of trying 
to diagnose the underlying fault which is likely to require at the very least 
making sure the driver is built with debugfs support enabled and may require 
adding a few printk statements into the kernel modules to reveal more details 
of the behaviour?

>
> I'm on 2.6.29-rc3, and the card is:
> 00:0a.0 Network controller: RaLink RT2500 802.11g Cardbus/mini-PCI (rev 01)
>         Subsystem: RaLink Device 2560
>         Flags: bus master, slow devsel, latency 64, IRQ 11
>         Memory at efffe000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8K]
>         Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2
>         Kernel driver in use: rt2500pci
>         Kernel modules: rt2500pci
>


  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-19 23:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-18 20:58 No ProbeResp == dead interface? Anders Eriksson
2009-02-19 23:16 ` Adam Baker [this message]
2009-02-20  7:47   ` [Rt2400-devel] " Anders Eriksson
2009-02-20 23:07     ` Adam Baker
2009-02-21 14:55       ` Anders Eriksson
2009-02-21 21:23         ` Adam Baker
2009-03-08 16:20           ` Anders Eriksson
2009-03-19 21:56             ` Adam Baker
2009-03-20  6:31               ` Anders Eriksson
2009-03-31 18:17                 ` Anders Eriksson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-03-18 14:45 aeriksson2

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200902192316.11628.linux@baker-net.org.uk \
    --to=linux@baker-net.org.uk \
    --cc=aeriksson@fastmail.fm \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rt2400-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).