From: Adam Baker <linux@baker-net.org.uk>
To: Anders Eriksson <aeriksson@fastmail.fm>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, rt2400-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Rt2400-devel] No ProbeResp == dead interface?
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 21:23:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200902212123.21950.linux@baker-net.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090221145528.5B11B2C4090@tippex.mynet.homeunix.org>
On Saturday 21 February 2009, Anders Eriksson wrote:
>
> What should I look out for wrt the queue counters?
>
The most interesting question would be which (if any) counters continue to
increment after it has failed.
> > Would be good to know if the legacy driver has the same issue - if it
> > does that might point to a hardware fault.
>
> Is that still maintained and working with new kernels? I recall needing to
> have different a different config setup for with the legacy driver (other
> name, and whatnot), so it's been a while.
>
According to http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=5174 it
works on 2.6.27 but a patch still needs writing for 2.6.28 onwards.
> This is a "once is a week" bug, so it's hard to say for sure when it's
> working correctly. If you really want me to, I could try the legay one for
> a couple of weeks...
>
Such low frequency bugs are usually a pain to track down. That also precludes
some of the more intrusive monitoring options that would result in huge logs
if applied for that long.
It's often worth checking dmesg output when it does fail too. Sometimes there
is useful info there that doesn't make it to syslog depending on your log
level settings.
Adam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-21 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-18 20:58 No ProbeResp == dead interface? Anders Eriksson
2009-02-19 23:16 ` [Rt2400-devel] " Adam Baker
2009-02-20 7:47 ` Anders Eriksson
2009-02-20 23:07 ` Adam Baker
2009-02-21 14:55 ` Anders Eriksson
2009-02-21 21:23 ` Adam Baker [this message]
2009-03-08 16:20 ` Anders Eriksson
2009-03-19 21:56 ` Adam Baker
2009-03-20 6:31 ` Anders Eriksson
2009-03-31 18:17 ` Anders Eriksson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-03-18 14:45 aeriksson2
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200902212123.21950.linux@baker-net.org.uk \
--to=linux@baker-net.org.uk \
--cc=aeriksson@fastmail.fm \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rt2400-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).