linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adam Baker <linux@baker-net.org.uk>
To: Anders Eriksson <aeriksson@fastmail.fm>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, rt2400-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Rt2400-devel] No ProbeResp == dead interface?
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 21:23:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200902212123.21950.linux@baker-net.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090221145528.5B11B2C4090@tippex.mynet.homeunix.org>

On Saturday 21 February 2009, Anders Eriksson wrote:
>
> What should I look out for wrt the queue counters?
>

The most interesting question would be which (if any) counters continue to 
increment after it has failed.

> > Would be good to know if the legacy driver has the same issue - if it
> > does that might point to a hardware fault.
>
> Is that still maintained and working with new kernels? I recall needing to
> have different a different config setup for with the legacy driver (other
> name, and whatnot), so it's been a while.
>

According to http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=5174 it 
works on 2.6.27 but a patch still needs writing for 2.6.28 onwards.

> This is a "once is a week" bug, so it's hard to say for sure when it's
> working correctly. If you really want me to, I could try the legay one for
> a couple of weeks...
>

Such low frequency bugs are usually a pain to track down. That also precludes 
some of the more intrusive monitoring options that would result in huge logs 
if applied for that long.

It's often worth checking dmesg output when it does fail too. Sometimes there 
is useful info there that doesn't make it to syslog depending on your log 
level settings.

Adam

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-21 21:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-18 20:58 No ProbeResp == dead interface? Anders Eriksson
2009-02-19 23:16 ` [Rt2400-devel] " Adam Baker
2009-02-20  7:47   ` Anders Eriksson
2009-02-20 23:07     ` Adam Baker
2009-02-21 14:55       ` Anders Eriksson
2009-02-21 21:23         ` Adam Baker [this message]
2009-03-08 16:20           ` Anders Eriksson
2009-03-19 21:56             ` Adam Baker
2009-03-20  6:31               ` Anders Eriksson
2009-03-31 18:17                 ` Anders Eriksson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-03-18 14:45 aeriksson2

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200902212123.21950.linux@baker-net.org.uk \
    --to=linux@baker-net.org.uk \
    --cc=aeriksson@fastmail.fm \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rt2400-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).