From: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net
Subject: Another "scan handling in mac80211" bug
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 18:38:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200903091838.16365.helmut.schaa@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
I was just unable to scan again after waking up from s2disk. Luckily I
still had some debug output in mac80211 from my previous patch:
[66796.154861] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready
[66796.164133] ieee80211_sta_work
[66796.164142] ieee80211_sta_work 2
[66796.178069] wlan0: direct probe to AP XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX try 1
[66796.375058] cfg80211_wext_siwscan
Ok, someone (I guess wpa_supplicant) triggered a scan.
[66796.375065] ieee80211_scan
[66796.375067] ieee80211_scan: request_scan
[66796.375070] ieee80211_request_scan
[66796.375073] ieee80211_request_scan queue_work
The scan is not started immediately due to mode == STA.
[66796.375116] ieee80211_sta_work
[66796.375120] ieee80211_sta_work 2
Good, the sta_work is executed but does not start the scan (I also had
a debug printk in ieee80211_start_scan).
Here's the according part of the code:
1759 if (ifmgd->state != IEEE80211_STA_MLME_DIRECT_PROBE &&
1760 ifmgd->state != IEEE80211_STA_MLME_AUTHENTICATE &&
1761 ifmgd->state != IEEE80211_STA_MLME_ASSOCIATE &&
1762 test_and_clear_bit(IEEE80211_STA_REQ_SCAN, &ifmgd->request)) {
1763 /*
1764 * The call to ieee80211_start_scan can fail but ieee80211_request_scan
1765 * (which queued ieee80211_sta_work) did not return an error. Thus, call
1766 * ieee80211_scan_failed here if ieee80211_start_scan fails in order to
1767 * notify the scan requester.
1768 */
1769 if (ieee80211_start_scan(sdata, local->scan_req))
1770 ieee80211_scan_failed(local);
1771 return;
1772 }
Ok, we are currently in state IEEE80211_STA_MLME_DIRECT_PROBE and as such
do not trigger the scan right away. IEEE80211_STA_REQ_SCAN should still be
set. Seems still fine to me.
[66796.375329] cfg80211_wext_siwscan EBUSY
[66796.376170] ieee80211_sta_work
[66796.376174] ieee80211_sta_work 2
[66796.376179] wlan0: direct probe to AP XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX try 2
[66796.576063] ieee80211_sta_work
[66796.576072] ieee80211_sta_work 2
[66796.576079] wlan0: direct probe to AP XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX try 3
[66796.776061] ieee80211_sta_work
[66796.776069] ieee80211_sta_work 2
[66796.776076] wlan0: direct probe to AP XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX timed out
Hmm, the direct probe timed out, thus the state moves to
IEEE80211_STA_MLME_DISABLED but sta_work will only run again when the
next association attempt is being made. However, we still have
IEEE80211_STA_REQ_SCAN set.
[66816.374308] cfg80211_wext_siwscan EBUSY
[66823.901663] cfg80211_wext_siwscan EBUSY
All subsequent scan requests will fail in cfg80211_wext_siwscan as mac80211
did not notify cfg80211 about the scan result.
I guess it should be sufficient to queue one more sta_work after the MLME
moves to IEEE80211_STA_MLME_DISABLED state. In case IEEE80211_STA_REQ_SCAN
is still set the scan will get started and cfg80211 gets notified about the
result.
Does that seem correct?
Thanks,
Helmut
next reply other threads:[~2009-03-09 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-09 17:38 Helmut Schaa [this message]
2009-03-09 18:48 ` Another "scan handling in mac80211" bug Johannes Berg
2009-03-09 19:56 ` Helmut Schaa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200903091838.16365.helmut.schaa@gmail.com \
--to=helmut.schaa@googlemail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).