From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:52036 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757767AbZCRVpt (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:45:49 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:37:48 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Ivo van Doorn Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Arnaud Patard , Gertjan van Wingerde , Dan Williams Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Fix SLAB corruption during rmmod Message-ID: <20090318213748.GE3527@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20090318_224612_029533_288BD6B8) References: <200903161925.41102.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <200903172256.35485.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <20090318130207.GA3527@tuxdriver.com> <200903181432.25098.IvDoorn@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200903181432.25098.IvDoorn@gmail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 02:32:24PM +0100, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > On Wednesday 18 March 2009, John W. Linville wrote: > > It's just that the merge conflicts created by this patch were awful. > > With 2.6.29's release presumably close, maybe this is a candidate > > for the stable tree? > > That would be fine as well. :) > Should I resend it to -stable when 2.6.29 final is out? Honestly, I think that is the best bet. Please do so! Thanks, John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.