From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>,
"Guy, Wey-Yi W" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@iki.fi>, Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Subject: Re: wireless powersaving (in NM?)
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:47:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090324134719.GA19335@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1237891149.4320.73.camel@johannes.local>
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:39:09AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> However, by putting the burden onto drivers, drivers can choose a
> conservative power saving level when no application has registered its
> pm_qos requirements, and once applications start using the it deeper
> power levels can be chosen as appropriate. This still requires some
> userspace to turn on power saving to start with, which I think would be
> appropriately placed in NM (or connman, of course).
I think you've made a good case for pushing the power savings decisions
onto the drivers.
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-24 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-24 10:39 wireless powersaving (in NM?) Johannes Berg
2009-03-24 10:32 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-03-25 10:45 ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-24 13:47 ` John W. Linville [this message]
2009-03-24 13:53 ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-24 14:47 ` Guy, Wey-Yi W
2009-03-24 15:03 ` Kalle Valo
2009-03-24 14:17 ` Kalle Valo
2009-03-25 10:57 ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-25 19:53 ` Kalle Valo
2009-03-25 20:06 ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-25 20:09 ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-25 20:22 ` Kalle Valo
2009-03-24 15:59 ` Dan Williams
2009-03-25 11:04 ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-25 15:31 ` Dan Williams
2009-03-25 15:48 ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-26 8:00 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-03-26 8:11 ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-26 8:39 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-03-26 8:54 ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-26 9:01 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-03-26 14:29 ` Georgy Berdyshev
2009-03-26 8:19 ` Kalle Valo
2009-03-26 8:40 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-03-31 16:28 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-01 11:04 ` more thoughts on power saving (was: wireless powersaving (in NM?)) Johannes Berg
2009-04-01 11:12 ` Kalle Valo
2009-04-01 14:29 ` Guy, Wey-Yi W
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090324134719.GA19335@tuxdriver.com \
--to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kalle.valo@iki.fi \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).