Re: [RFC] ath9k's regulatory domain code changes (for ar9170)

["Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>]

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 01:33:27PM -0700, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 March 2009 21:10:21 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> > > <lrodriguez@atheros.com> wrote:
> > >> Do any of you guys have time to pick it up?
> > >
> > > Well my patch #2 is pretty similar to what Christian has, and I'd like to
> > > upstream the first few patches soon (especially the ath.ko creation, it is a
> > > beast to rebase as you saw).  That would bring up the first contentious
> > > point of the merge: is "ath/ath.ko" ok with everyone?
> >
> > Yes.
> Yes.
> 
> > > ath5k/9k specific
> > > bits can eventually go in ath/{5k,9k} subdirs... not sure where 9170
> > > lives then :)
> >
> > Wherever Christian wants it. If he finds re-usable bits then great.
> maybe ath/9kusb ?

In that case maybe 9170/, we do have future USB plans.

> > > I probably can't get to it until the weekend, but if you have more time,
> > > Christian, feel free to adopt whatever you want from mine.  Otherwise I'll
> > > pick up where Luis left off on the weekend.
> Done! Patch attached, please add to the tree ;)

Nice....... so it seems all we need now is ath5k figured out and properly
tested.

  Luis