From: Huaxu Wan <huaxu.wan@linux.intel.com>
To: TJ <ubuntu@tjworld.net>
Cc: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: iwl3945: Don't queue rfkill_poll work when module is exiting
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:41:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090325034121.GA4792@owl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1237929739.5365.21.camel@hephaestion>
Hi,
This issue is confirmed here too. But during compile, there is warning =
about
cancel_work_sync(), cancel_delayed_work_sync() should be used instead.
And, without the modification in iwl3945_rfkill_poll() and=20
iwl3945_mac_stop(), just with one line cancel_delayed_work_sync(), this=
issue
is also fixed in my testing.
Best regards
Huaxu
PS: The following is the log when iwl3945 was unloaded before patched.
root@Januty-devel:~# modprobe -r iwl3945
[ 164.840610] iwl3945: U iwl3945_pci_remove *** UNLOAD DRIVER ***
[ 164.846515] iwl3945: U __iwl3945_down iwl3945 is going down
[ 164.852315] iwl3945: U iwl3945_hw_nic_stop_master stop master
[ 164.858634] iwl3945: U iwl3945_clear_free_frames 0 frames on pre-all=
ocated heap on clear.
[ 164.917177] iwl3945: U __iwl3945_down iwl3945 is going down
[ 164.922735] iwl3945: U iwl3945_clear_free_frames 0 frames on pre-all=
ocated heap on clear.
[ 166.804090] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 000077ff8=
b64b8c7
[ 166.808082] IP: [<ffffffff80262b62>] delayed_work_timer_fn+0x32/0x40
[ 166.808082] PGD 0=20
[ 166.808082] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP=20
[ 166.808082] last sysfs file: /sys/module/cfg80211/refcnt
[ 166.808082] Dumping ftrace buffer:
[ 166.808082] (ftrace buffer empty)
[ 166.808082] CPU 1=20
[ 166.808082] Modules linked in: lp parport arc4 ecb psmouse iTCO_wdt =
video serio_raw pcspkr usbhid intel_agp iTCO_vendor_support output ehci=
_hcd uhci_hcd ]
[ 166.808082] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.28.8 #1
[ 166.808082] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff80262b62>] [<ffffffff80262b62>] del=
ayed_work_timer_fn+0x32/0x40
[ 166.808082] RSP: 0018:ffff88007b62be80 EFLAGS: 00010246
[ 166.808082] RAX: 000077ff8b64b8bf RBX: ffff8800738df7c8 RCX: ffff880=
0738df7c8
[ 166.808082] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffff8800738df7c8 RDI: ffff880=
0738df7c8
[ 166.808082] RBP: ffff88007b62be80 R08: ffff8800738df820 R09: 0000000=
000000000
[ 166.808082] R10: ffff88007b625e18 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000=
000000100
[ 166.808082] R13: ffff88007b614000 R14: ffff88007b62beb0 R15: fffffff=
f80262b30
[ 166.808082] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88007bc02c00(0000) kn=
lGS:0000000000000000
[ 166.808082] CS: 0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b
[ 166.808082] CR2: 000077ff8b64b8c7 CR3: 0000000000201000 CR4: 0000000=
0000006a0
[ 166.808082] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000=
000000000
[ 166.808082] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000=
000000400
[ 166.808082] Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo ffff88007b624000, ta=
sk ffff88007b61c320)
[ 166.808082] Stack:
[ 166.808082] ffff88007b62bef0 ffffffff80259e39 ffff88007b615c18 ffff=
88007b615818
[ 166.808082] ffff88007b615418 ffff88007b615018 ffff88007b62beb0 ffff=
88007b62beb0
[ 166.808082] ffffffff80271efd 0000000000000008 0000000000000001 0000=
000000000100
[ 166.808082] Call Trace:
[ 166.808082] <IRQ> <0> [<ffffffff80259e39>] run_timer_softirq+0x179/=
0x260
[ 166.808082] [<ffffffff80271efd>] ? tick_handle_oneshot_broadcast+0x=
ed/0x100
[ 166.808082] [<ffffffff80254cfc>] __do_softirq+0x9c/0x170
[ 166.808082] [<ffffffff80213cac>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
[ 166.808082] [<ffffffff80214f0d>] do_softirq+0x5d/0xa0
[ 166.808082] [<ffffffff80254a7d>] irq_exit+0x8d/0xa0
[ 166.808082] [<ffffffff802151d5>] do_IRQ+0xc5/0x110
[ 166.808082] [<ffffffff80212b13>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x29
[ 166.808082] <EOI> <0> [<ffffffff8046d906>] ? acpi_idle_enter_simple=
+0x166/0x1a4
[ 166.808082] [<ffffffff8046d8fe>] ? acpi_idle_enter_simple+0x15e/0x1=
a4
[ 166.808082] [<ffffffff805745a5>] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0xa5/0x100
[ 166.808082] [<ffffffff80210e85>] ? cpu_idle+0x65/0xc0
[ 166.808082] [<ffffffff8067e6fd>] ? start_secondary+0x168/0x1bb
[ 166.808082] Code: 65 8b 14 25 24 00 00 00 48 89 e5 48 83 e0 fc 48 8b=
40 38 8b 70 20 48 8b 00 85 f6 0f 45 15 ff c9 72 00 48 f7 d0 48 89 ce 4=
8 63 d2 <48> 8=20
[ 166.808082] RIP [<ffffffff80262b62>] delayed_work_timer_fn+0x32/0x4=
0
[ 166.808082] RSP <ffff88007b62be80>
[ 166.808082] CR2: 000077ff8b64b8c7
[ 167.086916] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
On 21:22 Tue 24 Mar, TJ wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 18:51 +0100, Helmut Schaa wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 24. M=E4rz 2009 schrieb TJ:
> > > Tim Gardner suggested I forward this as a possible stable-release
> > > update. I found the problem in our current Ubuntu Jaunty tree - i=
wlwifi
> > > version 1.2.26k. What follows is a copy of the patch for Jaunty
> > > (2.6.28).
> >=20
> > The patch that introduced the rfkill polling did not hit mainline y=
et. It
> > should pop up in 2.6.30, hence this patch is not needed for any sta=
ble
> > series.
> >=20
> > I wasn't able to reproduce the issue by unloading iwl3945 here. Any=
hints
> > on how to reproduce this issue?
>=20
> lspci -nn -s 06:00.0
> 06:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 394=
5ABG [Golan] Network Connection [8086:4222] (rev 02)
>=20
> With the interface active and in use do:
>=20
> sudo modprobe -r iwl3945
>=20
> Approximately 2 seconds later the PC locks solid and requires a
> power-off button restart.
>=20
> Confirmed by another of our kernel team:
>=20
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/345710
>=20
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wirel=
ess" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireles=
s" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-25 3:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-24 15:44 iwl3945: Don't queue rfkill_poll work when module is exiting TJ
2009-03-24 17:51 ` Helmut Schaa
2009-03-24 21:22 ` TJ
2009-03-25 3:41 ` Huaxu Wan [this message]
2009-03-25 4:31 ` TJ
2009-03-26 19:39 ` reinette chatre
2009-04-02 22:36 ` reinette chatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090325034121.GA4792@owl \
--to=huaxu.wan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=helmut.schaa@googlemail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=ubuntu@tjworld.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).