From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:37803 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753109AbZEZIA3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2009 04:00:29 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 09:55:04 +0200 From: "John W. Linville" To: Galen P Zink Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Experimental Changes for Latency & Reliability Message-ID: <20090526075503.GA3321@tuxdriver.com> References: <19A53295-8338-45FA-BBEA-C0D48766DBED@zinkconsulting.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <19A53295-8338-45FA-BBEA-C0D48766DBED@zinkconsulting.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 04:15:02PM -0700, Galen P Zink wrote: > I'm experimenting with an application where adjusting the retransmit and > rate control policies could optimize performance. For my application, > latency, reliability and throughput are all concerns, with latency being > the largest concern, followed by reliability and throughput. This seems like the kind of proposal that needs more data to support it. What testing and measurement has been done with your changes? If possible, show numbers gathered both with the changes individually and with them together (possibly in various combinations). Thanks, John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.