* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 13317] New: No rt2x00 modules in RT kernels.
[not found] <bug-13317-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
@ 2009-05-28 7:02 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-28 8:40 ` John W. Linville
2009-05-28 9:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2009-05-28 7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-wireless, Thomas Gleixner, Steven Rostedt
Cc: bugzilla-daemon, bugme-daemon, dandart
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Fri, 15 May 2009 17:53:46 GMT bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13317
>
> Summary: No rt2x00 modules in RT kernels.
> Product: Alternate Trees
> Version: 2.5
> Kernel Version: 2.6.29+
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: high
> Priority: P1
> Component: rt
> AssignedTo: alt-trees_rt@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
> ReportedBy: dandart@googlemail.com
> Regression: No
>
>
> Is there a problem with using rt2x00 kernel modules with realtime kernels?
> In the info page it says that they need the symbol "BROKEN" which is probably
> to tell us that we can't use it. I can't compile it into kernels with an RT
> patch.
> Why? What's wrong with this mix of module and tree? Is there any way to make
> them happily coexist?
>
Good question, but bugzilla isn't a good place to ask it.
Presumably there's some bustage in the rt2x00 driver which makes it not
work with -rt kernels.
Did the -rt guys tell the wireless guys about this?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 13317] New: No rt2x00 modules in RT kernels.
2009-05-28 7:02 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 13317] New: No rt2x00 modules in RT kernels Andrew Morton
@ 2009-05-28 8:40 ` John W. Linville
2009-05-28 9:03 ` Ivo Van Doorn
2009-05-28 9:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: John W. Linville @ 2009-05-28 8:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: linux-wireless, Thomas Gleixner, Steven Rostedt, bugzilla-daemon,
bugme-daemon, dandart, ivdoorn
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:02:53AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Presumably there's some bustage in the rt2x00 driver which makes it not
> work with -rt kernels.
>
> Did the -rt guys tell the wireless guys about this?
Honestly, I don't recall hearing about it. Ivo?
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 13317] New: No rt2x00 modules in RT kernels.
2009-05-28 8:40 ` John W. Linville
@ 2009-05-28 9:03 ` Ivo Van Doorn
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ivo Van Doorn @ 2009-05-28 9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John W. Linville
Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-wireless, Thomas Gleixner, Steven Rostedt,
bugzilla-daemon, bugme-daemon, dandart
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:40 AM, John W. Linville
<linville@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:02:53AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>> Presumably there's some bustage in the rt2x00 driver which makes it not
>> work with -rt kernels.
>>
>> Did the -rt guys tell the wireless guys about this?
>
> Honestly, I don't recall hearing about it. Ivo?
No, I can't recall any -rt specific issues either, and so far no
regular open bug
is critical enough to make rt2x00 depend on CONFIG_BROKEN.
Ivo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 13317] New: No rt2x00 modules in RT kernels.
2009-05-28 7:02 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 13317] New: No rt2x00 modules in RT kernels Andrew Morton
2009-05-28 8:40 ` John W. Linville
@ 2009-05-28 9:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2009-05-28 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: linux-wireless, Steven Rostedt, bugzilla-daemon, bugme-daemon,
dandart
On Thu, 28 May 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Is there a problem with using rt2x00 kernel modules with realtime kernels?
> > In the info page it says that they need the symbol "BROKEN" which is probably
> > to tell us that we can't use it. I can't compile it into kernels with an RT
> > patch.
> > Why? What's wrong with this mix of module and tree? Is there any way to make
> > them happily coexist?
> >
>
> Good question, but bugzilla isn't a good place to ask it.
>
> Presumably there's some bustage in the rt2x00 driver which makes it not
> work with -rt kernels.
>
> Did the -rt guys tell the wireless guys about this?
There was some build failure which got fixed in meantime, but I forgot
to remove the broken flag.
Will do with the next release.
Thanks,
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-05-28 9:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-13317-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2009-05-28 7:02 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 13317] New: No rt2x00 modules in RT kernels Andrew Morton
2009-05-28 8:40 ` John W. Linville
2009-05-28 9:03 ` Ivo Van Doorn
2009-05-28 9:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).