linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 13317] New: No rt2x00 modules in RT kernels.
       [not found] <bug-13317-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
@ 2009-05-28  7:02 ` Andrew Morton
  2009-05-28  8:40   ` John W. Linville
  2009-05-28  9:07   ` Thomas Gleixner
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2009-05-28  7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-wireless, Thomas Gleixner, Steven Rostedt
  Cc: bugzilla-daemon, bugme-daemon, dandart


(switched to email.  Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).

On Fri, 15 May 2009 17:53:46 GMT bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:

> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13317
> 
>            Summary: No rt2x00 modules in RT kernels.
>            Product: Alternate Trees
>            Version: 2.5
>     Kernel Version: 2.6.29+
>           Platform: All
>         OS/Version: Linux
>               Tree: Mainline
>             Status: NEW
>           Severity: high
>           Priority: P1
>          Component: rt
>         AssignedTo: alt-trees_rt@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
>         ReportedBy: dandart@googlemail.com
>         Regression: No
> 
> 
> Is there a problem with using rt2x00 kernel modules with realtime kernels?
> In the info page it says that they need the symbol "BROKEN" which is probably
> to tell us that we can't use it. I can't compile it into kernels with an RT
> patch.
> Why? What's wrong with this mix of module and tree? Is there any way to make
> them happily coexist?
> 

Good question, but bugzilla isn't a good place to ask it.

Presumably there's some bustage in the rt2x00 driver which makes it not
work with -rt kernels.

Did the -rt guys tell the wireless guys about this?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 13317] New: No rt2x00 modules in RT kernels.
  2009-05-28  7:02 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 13317] New: No rt2x00 modules in RT kernels Andrew Morton
@ 2009-05-28  8:40   ` John W. Linville
  2009-05-28  9:03     ` Ivo Van Doorn
  2009-05-28  9:07   ` Thomas Gleixner
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: John W. Linville @ 2009-05-28  8:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton
  Cc: linux-wireless, Thomas Gleixner, Steven Rostedt, bugzilla-daemon,
	bugme-daemon, dandart, ivdoorn

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:02:53AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Presumably there's some bustage in the rt2x00 driver which makes it not
> work with -rt kernels.
> 
> Did the -rt guys tell the wireless guys about this?

Honestly, I don't recall hearing about it.  Ivo?

John
-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 13317] New: No rt2x00 modules in RT kernels.
  2009-05-28  8:40   ` John W. Linville
@ 2009-05-28  9:03     ` Ivo Van Doorn
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ivo Van Doorn @ 2009-05-28  9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: John W. Linville
  Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-wireless, Thomas Gleixner, Steven Rostedt,
	bugzilla-daemon, bugme-daemon, dandart

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:40 AM, John W. Linville
<linville@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:02:53AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>> Presumably there's some bustage in the rt2x00 driver which makes it not
>> work with -rt kernels.
>>
>> Did the -rt guys tell the wireless guys about this?
>
> Honestly, I don't recall hearing about it.  Ivo?

No, I can't recall any -rt specific issues either, and so far no
regular open bug
is critical enough to make rt2x00 depend on CONFIG_BROKEN.

Ivo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 13317] New: No rt2x00 modules in RT kernels.
  2009-05-28  7:02 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 13317] New: No rt2x00 modules in RT kernels Andrew Morton
  2009-05-28  8:40   ` John W. Linville
@ 2009-05-28  9:07   ` Thomas Gleixner
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2009-05-28  9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton
  Cc: linux-wireless, Steven Rostedt, bugzilla-daemon, bugme-daemon,
	dandart

On Thu, 28 May 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Is there a problem with using rt2x00 kernel modules with realtime kernels?
> > In the info page it says that they need the symbol "BROKEN" which is probably
> > to tell us that we can't use it. I can't compile it into kernels with an RT
> > patch.
> > Why? What's wrong with this mix of module and tree? Is there any way to make
> > them happily coexist?
> > 
> 
> Good question, but bugzilla isn't a good place to ask it.
> 
> Presumably there's some bustage in the rt2x00 driver which makes it not
> work with -rt kernels.
> 
> Did the -rt guys tell the wireless guys about this?

There was some build failure which got fixed in meantime, but I forgot
to remove the broken flag.

Will do with the next release.

Thanks,

	tglx


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-05-28  9:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-13317-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2009-05-28  7:02 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 13317] New: No rt2x00 modules in RT kernels Andrew Morton
2009-05-28  8:40   ` John W. Linville
2009-05-28  9:03     ` Ivo Van Doorn
2009-05-28  9:07   ` Thomas Gleixner

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).