From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.156]:13558 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750994AbZFBVxr convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:53:47 -0400 From: Ivo van Doorn To: alejandro.riveira@gmail.com Subject: Re: [2.6.27-rc7 vs 2.6.29 Regresion] Wifi Network Slownes rt2500pci Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:53:43 +0200 Cc: linux-wireless , linux-kernel , linville@tuxdriver.com, Greg KH , "Rafael J. Wysocki" References: <1243247687.5322.8.camel@varda> <200906021834.40009.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <1243961465.9894.3.camel@varda> In-Reply-To: <1243961465.9894.3.camel@varda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Message-Id: <200906022353.44284.IvDoorn@gmail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tuesday 02 June 2009, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote: > El mar, 02-06-2009 a las 18:34 +0200, Ivo van Doorn escribió: > > On Tuesday 02 June 2009, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote: > > [...] > > > > ICMP ECHO REQUEST > > > > > > Any advance? > > > > Well I checked the dumps from the bugreport, but like I expected > > the only difference is that with the slow speed the correct value > > is written, and the fast speed the wrong value is written. > > So my chip works better with incorrect values written in its registers? Apparently, probably because some other register is set to an incorrect value, but I have no idea which one that would be. > What about other chips out there do they prefer wrong values too ;) > Maybe what we thought wrong values are not that wrong ? They are wrong. That exact register initialization is pretty straightforward in the original Ralink driver on which rt2x00 is based. Ivo