From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:9881 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753578AbZFCWsy (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2009 18:48:54 -0400 From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez To: wimax@linuxwimax.org Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 3 (rfkill) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 06:48:11 +0800 Cc: Johannes Berg , Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , LKML , linux-wimax@intel.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org References: <20090603190952.2dd0cc70.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4A26B0D2.3090207@oracle.com> <1244050400.22105.0.camel@johannes.local> In-Reply-To: <1244050400.22105.0.camel@johannes.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <200906040648.11839.inaky@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thursday 04 June 2009, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 10:20 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > Ugh, there are similar errors in the wimax area, which doesn't > > seem to mention RFKILL in its Kconfig file at all. :( > > Guess it too will have to get a > > depends on RFKILL || !RFKILL > > I can take care of it after dinner. Ugh...bitten again by Randy's evil autobuilder. Thanks for fixing it, Johannes. -- Inaky