From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
To: Vasanth Thiagarajan <Vasanth.Thiagarajan@Atheros.com>
Cc: Luis Rodriguez <Luis.Rodriguez@Atheros.com>,
"linville@tuxdriver.com" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
"johannes@sipsolutions.net" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] ath9k: fix oops by downgrading assert in rc.c
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 11:29:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090605182944.GD30211@tesla> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090605075252.GG17632@vasanth-laptop>
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:52:52AM -0700, Vasanth Thiagarajan wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 01:17:16PM +0530, Luis Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Vasanthakumar
> > Thiagarajan<vasanth@atheros.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +
> > >> + /*
> > >> + * Fine tuning for when no decent rate was found, the
> > >> + * lowest should *not* be used under normal circumstances.
> > >> + */
> > >> + if (rix == ath_rc_priv->valid_rate_index[0]) {
> > >> + DPRINTF(sc, ATH_DBG_RATE, "lowest rate being used, "
> > >> + "disabling MRR\n");
> > >> + rates[0].idx = rate_lowest_index(sband, sta);
> > >> + /* Disable MRR when ath_rc_ratefind_ht() found rate 0 */
> > >> + rates[1].idx = -1;
> > >> + }
> > >
> > > I think we can still fill other rates (1..3) with the lowest rate
> > > index as we dont differentiate the situation where the lowest rate
> > > is chosen truely by the algorithm from this particular case.
> >
> > I thought about that as well, but does it really make sense for us to
> > use MRR with the same lowest rate? That's why I just used one segment.
> > Thoughts?
>
> or we can try for max_retry (4) times. In that case the rate indices of
> other rates (just not 1) should be made -1 or this segment should be
> moved just below the rate find.
So the count should have already been set up to 4, and the next segment [1]
is set to -1. Please let me know if there is anything else you see needs
change.
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-05 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-05 5:41 [PATCH 00/15] ath9k/mac80211/iwlwifi: rate control cleanup Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH 01/15] ath9k: fix oops by downgrading assert in rc.c Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-06-05 6:30 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2009-06-05 7:47 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-06-05 7:52 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2009-06-05 18:29 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2009-06-06 6:55 ` Vasanth Thiagarajan
2009-06-09 0:26 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-06-09 0:58 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-06-09 5:24 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2009-06-09 5:27 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2009-06-09 5:35 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2009-06-09 5:19 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2009-06-05 22:16 ` Gábor Stefanik
2009-06-05 22:27 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH 02/15] ath9k: cleanup try count for MRR in rate control Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH 03/15] ath9k: remove unused min rate calculation code Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH 04/15] ath9k: remove unused stepdown when looking for the next rate Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH 05/15] ath9k: remove pointless wrapper ath_rc_rate_getidx() Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH 06/15] ath9k: rename ath_rc_get_nextlowervalid_txrate() Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH 07/15] ath9k: remove unused ath_rc_isvalid_txmask() Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH 08/15] ath9k: remove ATH9K_MODE_11B Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH 09/15] ath9k: remap ATH9K_MODE_* Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH 10/15] ath9k: rename ath_rc_ratefind_ht() to ath_rc_get_highest_rix() Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH 11/15] ath9k: remove unnecessary IEEE80211_TX_CTL_NO_ACK checks Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH 12/15] mac80211: make minstrel/pid RC use ieee80211_is_data(fc) Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-06-05 6:24 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-05 6:34 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-06-05 6:52 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH 13/15] iwlwifi: " Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-06-05 14:56 ` Help ath5k José Luis Vargas Araoz
2009-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH 14/15] mac80211: move management / no-ack frame rate decision to mac80211 Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-06-05 6:28 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-05 7:42 ` [ath9k-devel] " Jouni Malinen
2009-06-05 7:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH 15/15] ath9k: remove rate control wraper Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-06-05 5:52 ` [PATCH 00/15] ath9k/mac80211/iwlwifi: rate control cleanup Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090605182944.GD30211@tesla \
--to=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
--cc=Luis.Rodriguez@Atheros.com \
--cc=Vasanth.Thiagarajan@Atheros.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).