From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: gregor kowski <gregor.kowski@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] b43 add harware tkip
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 17:20:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200906081720.59594.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83a869cd0906071450h24ed4119s44d00db0d97d59e2@mail.gmail.com>
Well, first thing is that I do think there is a reason Broadcom removed hw TKIP
support from their drivers. ;)
But well, let's look at the patch.
> + /* FIXME this is the wrong offset : it goes in tkip rx phase1 shm */
> +#if 0
> b43_write_probe_resp_plcp(dev, 0x31A, size, &b43_b_ratetable[0]);
> b43_write_probe_resp_plcp(dev, 0x32C, size, &b43_b_ratetable[1]);
> b43_write_probe_resp_plcp(dev, 0x33E, size, &b43_b_ratetable[2]);
> b43_write_probe_resp_plcp(dev, 0x350, size, &b43_b_ratetable[3]);
> +#endif
This looks interesting. Care to find out the correct offsets and submit
this fix as a separate patch?
> + if (algorithm == B43_SEC_ALGO_TKIP) {
> + /*
> + * We should provide an initial iv32, phase1key pair.
> + * We could start with iv32=0 and compute the corresponding
> + * phase1key, but this mean calling ieee80211_get_tkip_key
> + * with a fake skb (or export other tkip function).
> + * Because we are lazy we hope iv32 won't start with
> + * 0xffff and let's b43_mac_update_tkip_key provide a
> + * correct pair.
> + */
> + rx_tkip_phase1_write(dev, index, 0xffff, (u16*)buf);
> + } else /* clear it */
> + rx_tkip_phase1_write(dev, index, 0, (u16*)buf);
Why do you write phase1, if TKIP is not used?
> + /* FIXME : for b43_new_kidx_api, there can be 54 key
> + * instead of 50 in RCMTA and TKIPTSCTTAK.
> + */
I don't understand this comment.
> - if (algorithm == B43_SEC_ALGO_TKIP) {
> - /* FIXME: No TKIP hardware encryption for now. */
> + if (algorithm == B43_SEC_ALGO_TKIP &&
> + (!(key->flags & IEEE80211_KEY_FLAG_PAIRWISE) ||
> + key->flags & IEEE80211_KEY_FLAG_WMM_STA )) {
> + /* We support only one rx queue (no QOS) and pairwise key */
This comment doesn't really make sense to me, too.
What does QoS have to do with the RX queue?
Next time please inline the patch ;)
--
Greetings, Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-08 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-07 21:50 [PATCH] b43 add harware tkip gregor kowski
2009-06-07 22:34 ` Gábor Stefanik
2009-06-08 6:24 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-08 18:31 ` Gábor Stefanik
2009-06-08 15:20 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2009-06-08 18:04 ` gregor kowski
2009-06-08 18:16 ` Michael Buesch
2009-06-09 18:01 ` gregor kowski
2009-06-22 20:58 ` gregor kowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200906081720.59594.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=gregor.kowski@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).