From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.atheros.com ([12.36.123.2]:10925 "EHLO mail.atheros.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932173AbZFOSNC (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:13:02 -0400 Received: from mail.atheros.com ([10.10.20.105]) by sidewinder.atheros.com for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:13:05 -0700 Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:13:08 -0700 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: Marcel Holtmann CC: Luis Rodriguez , "linville@tuxdriver.com" , "chunkeey@web.de" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "jal2@gmx.de" , Peter Grabienski , Stephen Chen , Michael Fortin , Johnny Cheng , Yuan-Gu Wei , "otus-devel@lists.madwifi-project.org" , Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ar9170: 1-stage firmware support / AVM fritz Message-ID: <20090615181308.GC22922@tesla> References: <1243546565-19404-1-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <1244992308.15367.3.camel@violet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <1244992308.15367.3.camel@violet> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 08:11:48AM -0700, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Hi Luis, > > > This series now works for me on my WNDA31000, it took a newer shiny > > 1-stage firmware to work. I'll push the firmware into linux-firmware > > next. > > > > Should work with the AVM Fritz devices now, haven't tested it but > > I think it should work. > > I happened to have one of these AVM devices. With ar9170.fw firmware it > does work fine with the other ones it doesn't. Excellent, that was the idea behind the patch, to enable these devices. Thanks for testing. > The ar9170.fw is still not in linux-firmware.git, any reason for that? Yes, the patch I sent to David has some funk as objcopy to ihex seems to have some trailing white space. I sent a new patch to him without the ihex file though. > Also since ar9170-1.fw and ar9170-2.fw are not working at all, They work, they won't work for the AVM device though. > we better > not even try and give the user a crypted error message that the device > is in a bad state. Just printk that the firmware might be too old. Agreed, but as I sent the patch in we *require* the 1-stage firmware for the AVM devices, if that is not present we should be bailing out. Is that not what happens? Luis