linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.31-rc1] iwlagn (4965): regression when hardware rf switch is used
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:48:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200906291148.55386.elendil@planet.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1246268022.7775.24.camel@johannes.local>

On Monday 29 June 2009, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > [enable]
> > usb 3-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 3
> > usb 3-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
>
> That is completely unrelated. You plugged in a USB device too :)

No, it's my "bluetooth + wlan" device. Note that disabling wireless with 
the hardware switch also gives 'usb 3-1: USB disconnect, address 2'.

>From lsusb:
Bus 003 Device 002: ID 03f0:171d Hewlett-Packard Wireless (Bluetooth + 
WLAN) Interface [Integrated Module]

> > A lot uglier with those errors. And after that I have to run
> > ifdown/ifup before networking is up again (ifup only does not work as
> > it will complain "interface already configured"):
>
> And that's actually expected, and/or a bug in the debian networking
> scripts.
> (You can trigger the same problem by doing
> ifup wlan0
> ip link set wlan0 down
> ifup wlan0 -> error)

OK, I can accept that. Wonder why it does work with 2.6.30 then. But it 
can certainly wait until the driver problem you mentioned is resolved.

> To get your network connection back automatically we will require
> changes to userland tools to listen to rfkill events.
>
> > BTW, would it make sense to bring back the first two lines shown with
> > .30 (or at least the first one):
> >    iwlagn 0000:10:00.0: Radio Frequency Kill Switch is On:
> >    Kill switch must be turned off for wireless networking to work.
> > IMHO it's good to register the reason for the disconnect.
>
> I guess something like that could be added to cfg80211:
> phy0: taking interfaces down due to rfkill

Yes, that would be nice.

Thanks,
FJP

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-29  9:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-29  9:28 [2.6.31-rc1] iwlagn (4965): regression when hardware rf switch is used Frans Pop
2009-06-29  9:33 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-29  9:48   ` Frans Pop [this message]
2009-06-29  9:53     ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-30 17:44 ` reinette chatre
2009-07-01 15:58   ` Frans Pop

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200906291148.55386.elendil@planet.nl \
    --to=elendil@planet.nl \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).