From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.deathmatch.net ([72.66.92.28]:1620 "EHLO mail.deathmatch.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754127AbZGELy1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Jul 2009 07:54:27 -0400 Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 07:53:23 -0400 From: Bob Copeland To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Jiri Slaby , linville@tuxdriver.com, mickflemm@gmail.com, lrodriguez@atheros.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ath5k: do not release irq across suspend/resume Message-ID: <20090705115323.GC2132@hash.localnet> References: <1246726795-3934-1-git-send-email-me@bobcopeland.com> <1246726795-3934-5-git-send-email-me@bobcopeland.com> <4A4FC889.9000401@gmail.com> <200907042337.59470.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200907042337.59470.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 11:37:58PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Someone recently asked on a mailing list (unfortunately I can't recall > which one) if drivers should release irqs over suspend. Yeah, it was linux-wireless. Original message is here: http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=124515641807355 (The paraphrasing is rather liberal but that was the gist.) -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com