From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from 128-177-27-249.ip.openhosting.com ([128.177.27.249]:53656 "EHLO jmalinen.user.openhosting.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751718AbZGJSNl (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:13:41 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:13:24 +0300 From: Jouni Malinen To: Johannes Berg Cc: John Linville , Jouni Malinen , linux-wireless Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] mac80211_hwsim: report fixed signal strength Message-ID: <20090710181324.GA7493@jm.kir.nu> References: <1247237819.29747.3.camel@johannes.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1247237819.29747.3.camel@johannes.local> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:56:59PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > There's no reason to think that hwsim has any > actual signal strength, but for testing it is > very useful to have it report _some_ value to > the stack so I can see if the value ends up > being reported correctly > Anyone have any objections? I'm not sure -- but it's still useful at > least for me testing the upper layers. At some point, we might even get to simulating (e.g., by a user space app) signal strength more properly, but for now, this looks fine to me. -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA