From: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "linux-wireless" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT 5/5] mac80211: implement basic background scanning
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:40:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200907161240.25574.helmut.schaa@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1247739394.29762.9.camel@johannes.local>
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juli 2009 schrieb Johannes Berg:
> On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 11:50 +0200, Helmut Schaa wrote:
> > Maybe I should use other terms. Ideas?
>
> Ah, ok. Since your patch 4/5 changes sw_scanning to SW_SCANNING, I think
> at least change it to BG_SCANNING there already. OTOH, I think people
> are used to sw_scanning so it would be better to keep it. Maybe do
> SW_SCANNING
> and
> SW_SCANNING | OFF_CHANNEL
>
> or maybe
> SW_SCANNING | PROBING
> or something like that?
Yes, something like this sounds better and does not cause so much confusion.
> > > Anyway looks pretty good to me! How does it fare during ping -f or
> > > something?
> >
> > I compared it to the hw_scan implementation of iwlwifi. We loose a few
> > more frames (I guess due to not flushing the queues before channel switch)
> > but it's not really much, it was <1% for ping -f).
>
> Yeah, we still need to add a queue flush callback for the hardware, but
> that can wait some more.
Right, that can wait :)
> > I didn't do much performance testing, just a single wget and the performance
> > dropped to about 50%. I still have to run some iperf tests (both RX and TX) to
> > see how it behaves.
>
> I'd be more interested in the rtt stats that ping -f prints after you
> abort it:
>
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.021/0.028/1.726/0.051 ms
I don't have any stats here anymore but if I remember correctly the max rtt I
got was around 250ms. Will try that again when I'm back in the evening.
Helmut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-16 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-16 9:04 [RFC/RFT 0/5] mac80211: implement background scan Helmut Schaa
2009-07-16 9:06 ` [RFC/RFT 1/5] mac80211: refactor the scan code Helmut Schaa
2009-07-16 9:07 ` [RFC/RFT 2/5] mac80211: advance the state machine immediately if no delay is needed Helmut Schaa
2009-07-16 9:08 ` [RFC/RFT 3/5] mac80211: introduce a new scan state "decision" Helmut Schaa
2009-07-16 9:08 ` [RFC/RFT 4/5] mac80211: Replace {sw,hw}_scanning variables with a bitfield Helmut Schaa
2009-07-16 16:30 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-07-16 16:43 ` Johannes Berg
2009-07-16 16:49 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-07-16 9:09 ` [RFC/RFT 5/5] mac80211: implement basic background scanning Helmut Schaa
2009-07-16 9:25 ` Johannes Berg
2009-07-16 9:50 ` Helmut Schaa
2009-07-16 10:16 ` Johannes Berg
2009-07-16 10:40 ` Helmut Schaa [this message]
2009-07-16 20:52 ` Helmut Schaa
2009-07-16 21:17 ` Johannes Berg
2009-07-16 14:20 ` Johannes Berg
2009-07-16 21:22 ` [RFC/RFT 0/5] mac80211: implement background scan Johannes Berg
2009-07-16 21:52 ` Helmut Schaa
2009-07-17 12:50 ` Helmut Schaa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200907161240.25574.helmut.schaa@gmail.com \
--to=helmut.schaa@googlemail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).