From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:37130 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753855AbZGZSA7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:00:59 -0400 Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:52:57 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: David Miller Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-07-24 Message-ID: <20090726175257.GA5630@tuxdriver.com> References: <20090724193625.GB2711@tuxdriver.com> <20090726.100214.125172881.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 In-Reply-To: <20090726.100214.125172881.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:02:14AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: "John W. Linville" > Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:36:25 -0400 > > > Here is the latest huge round of wireless patches intended for 2.6.32. > > It hits all the usual areas (i.e. drivers, mac80211, and cfg80211) with > > patches from all the usual suspects. This includes the reworking of > > mac80211 to eliminate the confusing "master netdev". > > > > FWIW, my laptop has been happy with it. Most of the bits here have been > > in -next for at least a few days. > > > > Please let me know if there are problems! > > Pulled, thanks a lot John! > > Please try to resolve the regression reports that I saw posted against > wireless-testing on the same day you sent this pull request. Certainly! But FWIW I think most of those are about patches that I have not yet sent to you, so I don't think you need to worry a lot about your tree ATM. John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready. ¡Viva Honduras Libre!