From: Chris Clayton <chris2553@googlemail.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug #13846] Possible regression in rt61pci driver
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:31:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200908031931.27427.chris2553@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <iZB3Pj-uj3M.A.pRC.1cgdKB@chimera>
Hi Rafael,
On Sunday 02 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
The folks on the wireless project have concluded that the problem I reported is down to a hardware
problem when power saving is switched on on for my Belkin cardbus wireless adapter, so now I simply
turn power-saving off when wlan0 comes up. I did, however, ask whether anyone was going to fix the
fact that once power-saving turns the LEDs off, they never come back on again, but I haven't had an
answer. Is that a regression? I guess the answer is no, because power saving in the rt61pci driver
is feature that is new to 2.6.31. Should it be fixed? I think the answer is yes, but being unable
to do it myself, I probably don't have a vote :-)
All I can do is report that I now know how to avoid my laptop freezing and leave the decision as to
whether it should stay on the regression list to you and the folks from the wireless project.
Thanks,
Chris
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13846
> Subject : Possible regression in rt61pci driver
> Submitter : Chris Clayton <chris2553@googlemail.com>
> Date : 2009-07-13 8:27 (21 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124747418828398&w=4
--
No, Sir; there is nothing which has yet been contrived by man, by which so much happiness is
produced as by a good tavern or inn - Doctor Samuel Johnson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-03 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-02 18:49 2.6.31-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-02 22:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-03 14:31 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-08-03 16:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-03 15:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <iZB3Pj-uj3M.A.pRC.1cgdKB@chimera>
2009-08-03 18:31 ` Chris Clayton [this message]
2009-08-03 19:17 ` [Bug #13846] Possible regression in rt61pci driver Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-03 20:17 ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-08-04 16:04 ` Chris Clayton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200908031931.27427.chris2553@googlemail.com \
--to=chris2553@googlemail.com \
--cc=kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).